1998
DOI: 10.2307/3547042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Payoff from Self and Conspecific Superparasitism in a Dryinid Parasitoid, Haplogonatopus atratus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conspecific superparasitism, which involves ovipositing on or in a conspecifically parasitized host (van Dijken & Waage, ), is usually profitable, in that it rewards the parasitoid with a fitness gain, especially when the interval between the first and second ovipositions (i.e., the oviposition interval) is short (e.g., Visser et al ., ; Sirot, ; Field et al ., ; Lebreton et al ., ); however, the gain is less than that from ovipositing on or in a healthy host. Meanwhile, self‐superparasitism is generally considered less profitable than conspecific superparasitism due to the siblings facing competition for limited resources (e.g., Yamada & Miyamoto, ; Yamada & Watanabe, ; Yamada & Ikawa, ); in particular, it is usually non‐ or negatively profitable for solitary parasitoids except in cases where multiple parasitoid immatures guarantee a higher emergence probability of 1 adult, which is probably due to greater suppression of the immune systems of the host when multiple individuals are present (Puttler & van den Bosch, ). Thus, an ability to discriminate between self‐ and conspecifically parasitized hosts is expected to evolve (van Alphen & Visser, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conspecific superparasitism, which involves ovipositing on or in a conspecifically parasitized host (van Dijken & Waage, ), is usually profitable, in that it rewards the parasitoid with a fitness gain, especially when the interval between the first and second ovipositions (i.e., the oviposition interval) is short (e.g., Visser et al ., ; Sirot, ; Field et al ., ; Lebreton et al ., ); however, the gain is less than that from ovipositing on or in a healthy host. Meanwhile, self‐superparasitism is generally considered less profitable than conspecific superparasitism due to the siblings facing competition for limited resources (e.g., Yamada & Miyamoto, ; Yamada & Watanabe, ; Yamada & Ikawa, ); in particular, it is usually non‐ or negatively profitable for solitary parasitoids except in cases where multiple parasitoid immatures guarantee a higher emergence probability of 1 adult, which is probably due to greater suppression of the immune systems of the host when multiple individuals are present (Puttler & van den Bosch, ). Thus, an ability to discriminate between self‐ and conspecifically parasitized hosts is expected to evolve (van Alphen & Visser, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second comers are usually handicapped in competition (Salt, 1961; Vinson & Hegazi, 1998), and their probability of survival decreases as the interval between the first and second ovipositions increases, dropping to zero when the interval is 1–2 days (Strand & Godfray, 1989; Visser et al ., 1992; Sirot, 1996; Field et al ., 1997). Infanticide, including ovicide, is an effective method for overcoming this handicap (Yamada & Miyamoto, 1998; Yamada & Watanabe, 2002), and is selectively advantageous for parasitoids that are attempting to superparasitise. This is true for conspecific superparasitism (in which the mothers of the first and second comers are different) but not for self‐superparasitism (in which the mother of the first and second comers is the same).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those studies tracked single females, however, while we used small groups of parasitoid females. Two possible reasons for our results are (1) an elevated mature egg load in the females who have had multiple recent oviposition opportunities, stimulating high production, and (2) intra-specific competition for host eggs (Fletcher et al 1994;Yamada and Miyamoto 1998). Montoya et al (2000), studying mass reared D. longicaudata, found an inverse relationship between superparasitism and parasitoid emergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%