2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PB-GCN: Progressive binary graph convolutional networks for skeleton-based action recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Year Top-1(%) Top-5(%) ST-GCN [25] 2018 30.7 52.8 STGR-GCN [60] 2019 33.6 56.1 AS-GCN [50] 2019 34.8 56.5 2s-AGCN [26] 2019 36.1 58.7 DGNN [39] 2019 36.9 59.6 BAGCN [61] 2019 37.3 60.2 L-CAGCN [62] 2020 33.3 55.4 A-CAGCN [62] 2020 34.1 56.6 GCN-NAS [48] 2020 37.1 60.1 2s-AAGCN [27] 2020 37.4 60.4 CGCN [63] 2020 37.5 60.4 MS-AAGCN [27] 2020 37.8 61.0 Dynamic GCN [30] 2020 37.9 61.3 MS-G3D [28] 2020 38 60.9 MS-AAGCN+TEM [47] 2020 38 61.4 2s-AAGCN+TEM [47] 2020 38.6 61.6 PR-GCN [64] 2021 33.7 55.8 ST-TR [36] 2021 37 59.7 SEFN(Att) [31] 2021 37.7 N/A SEFN(Base) [31] 2021 37.8 N/A ST-TR-agcn [36] 2021 38 60.5 PB-GCN [65] 2022 30.9 52.8 PeGCN [66] 2022 34.8 57.2 Graph2Net [32] 2022 36.8 N/A EGCN [67] 2022 37.1 59.7 Sybio-GNN [33] 2022 37.2 58.1 TE-GCN [68] 2022 37. can be seen that the additional motion streams cannot bring evident improvement to the Kinetics-Skeleton dataset. Even, the MS-AAGCN+TEM is inferior to 2s-AAGCN+TEM by 0.6% top-1 accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Year Top-1(%) Top-5(%) ST-GCN [25] 2018 30.7 52.8 STGR-GCN [60] 2019 33.6 56.1 AS-GCN [50] 2019 34.8 56.5 2s-AGCN [26] 2019 36.1 58.7 DGNN [39] 2019 36.9 59.6 BAGCN [61] 2019 37.3 60.2 L-CAGCN [62] 2020 33.3 55.4 A-CAGCN [62] 2020 34.1 56.6 GCN-NAS [48] 2020 37.1 60.1 2s-AAGCN [27] 2020 37.4 60.4 CGCN [63] 2020 37.5 60.4 MS-AAGCN [27] 2020 37.8 61.0 Dynamic GCN [30] 2020 37.9 61.3 MS-G3D [28] 2020 38 60.9 MS-AAGCN+TEM [47] 2020 38 61.4 2s-AAGCN+TEM [47] 2020 38.6 61.6 PR-GCN [64] 2021 33.7 55.8 ST-TR [36] 2021 37 59.7 SEFN(Att) [31] 2021 37.7 N/A SEFN(Base) [31] 2021 37.8 N/A ST-TR-agcn [36] 2021 38 60.5 PB-GCN [65] 2022 30.9 52.8 PeGCN [66] 2022 34.8 57.2 Graph2Net [32] 2022 36.8 N/A EGCN [67] 2022 37.1 59.7 Sybio-GNN [33] 2022 37.2 58.1 TE-GCN [68] 2022 37. can be seen that the additional motion streams cannot bring evident improvement to the Kinetics-Skeleton dataset. Even, the MS-AAGCN+TEM is inferior to 2s-AAGCN+TEM by 0.6% top-1 accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Year CS(%) CV(%) GCA-LSTM [17] 2018 74.3 82.8 ST-GCN [25] 2018 81.5 88.3 SR-TSL [15] 2018 84.8 92.4 HCN [69] 2018 86.5 91.1 DPRL+GCNN [35] 2018 83.5 89.8 AS-GCN [50] 2019 86.8 94.2 AGC-LSTM [70] 2019 89.2 95.0 2s-AGCN [26] 2019 88.5 95.1 DGNN [39] 2019 89.9 96.1 BAGCN [61] 2019 90.3 96.3 STGR-GCN [60] 2019 86.9 92.3 TS-SAN [71] 2020 87.2 92.7 2s-AAGCN+TEM [47] 2020 88.7 95.8 SGN [72] 2020 89.0 94.5 2s-Shift-GCN [29] 2020 89.7 96 GCN-NAS [48] 2020 89.4 95.7 2s-AAGCN [27] 2020 89.4 96.0 MS-AAGCN [27] 2020 90.0 96.2 CGCN [63] 2020 90.3 96.4 4s-Shift-GCN [29] 2020 90.7 96.5 MS-AAGCN+TEM [47] 2020 91 96.5 Dynamic GCN [30] 2020 91.5 96 MS-G3D [28] 2020 91.5 96.2 PR-GCN [64] 2021 85.2 91.7 RA-GCN [49] 2021 87.3 93.6 SEFN(Base) [31] 2021 89.2 95.8 ST-TR [36] 2021 89.9 96.1 SEFN(Att) [31] 2021 90.2 96.1 ST-TR-agcn [36] 2021 90.3 96.3 MSTGNN [73] 2021 91.3 95.5 PB-GCN [65] 2022 83.8 91.3 PeGCN [66] 2022 85.6 93.4 LAGA [51] 2022 87.1 93.2 TE-GCN [68] 2022 88.7 95.4 EGCN [67] 2022 89.1 95.5 Graph2Net [32] 2022 90.1 96 Sybio-GNN [33] 2022 90.1 95.4 CD-GCN [34] 2022 90.1 96.5 Ta-CNN [24] 2022 90.7 95.1 FR-AGCN [52] 2022 90. is c...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adjacency matrix was used as a shared topology for all channels, and the channelspecific correlations were used as a non-shared topology for each channel. Zhao et al [22] introduced two progressive binary graph convolutional networks, in which the filters and activations were binarized to decrease the parameters, which could improve the training and inference speed. Zhang [23] proposed a spatial attentive and temporal dilated (SATD) method, in which the spatial attention pooling module (SAP) is proposed to identify important vertices and to remove unimportant vertices, and the temporal dilated graph convolution module is used to expand the receptive field.…”
Section: Graph Covolutional Network For Skeleton-based Action Recogni...mentioning
confidence: 99%