2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pc-577-02 a Case of Coronary Artery Vasospasm; A Rare Complication of Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for Atrial Fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CAS during RF ablation of AF has been previously described in other reports 5 with an estimated incidence of about 0.3% in a large Japanese cohort of patients. 6 CAS was also reported with the use of cryoballoon 7 and after vein of Marshall ethanol infusion 8 for AF ablation. Proposed mechanisms of CAS related to the ablation procedure include direct thermal effects on the coronary artery, indirect effects of cryoenergy-induced blood cooling, and autonomic nervous system imbalance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…CAS during RF ablation of AF has been previously described in other reports 5 with an estimated incidence of about 0.3% in a large Japanese cohort of patients. 6 CAS was also reported with the use of cryoballoon 7 and after vein of Marshall ethanol infusion 8 for AF ablation. Proposed mechanisms of CAS related to the ablation procedure include direct thermal effects on the coronary artery, indirect effects of cryoenergy-induced blood cooling, and autonomic nervous system imbalance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, a meta-analysis conducted by He et al (7) also revealed that VOM-ABL procedure was feasible, effective, and safe by reducing AF/AT recurrence rate without increasing the risk of cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion. However, challenges still remained, which included few studies providing reliable conclusion due to short-term follow-up (less than one-year) (24,25), limited to case reports (26,27) and lack of control group (single-arm study) (28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%