2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-015-2872-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCET based copy-move forgery detection in images under geometric transforms

Abstract: With the advent of the powerful editing software and sophisticated digital cameras, it is now possible to manipulate images. Copy-move is one of the most common methods for image manipulation. Several methods have been proposed to detect and locate the tampered regions, while many methods failed when the copied region undergone some geometric transformations before being pasted, because of the de-synchronization in the searching procedure. This paper presents an efficient technique for detecting the copy-move … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection performance of the proposed CMFD is compared with that of the state-ofthe-art techniques in literature that used the same CoMoFoD dataset and validation metrics to achieve fair comparison. Table 8 presents a comparison of the proposed approach with other popular approaches, namely, HOG [3], HOGM [39], PCET [40], LGWP [41] and Convolutional Kernel Network [42]. The proposed CMFD based on QPCET descriptors provide superior detection efficiency to previous methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection performance of the proposed CMFD is compared with that of the state-ofthe-art techniques in literature that used the same CoMoFoD dataset and validation metrics to achieve fair comparison. Table 8 presents a comparison of the proposed approach with other popular approaches, namely, HOG [3], HOGM [39], PCET [40], LGWP [41] and Convolutional Kernel Network [42]. The proposed CMFD based on QPCET descriptors provide superior detection efficiency to previous methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the performances comparisons between the proposed algorithm and the state-of-the-art algorithms on resisting rotation, scaling and down-sampling transforms. As shown in Figure 6(a1), the anti-rotation performance of the proposed algorithm is a little lower than that of algorithm [7] at precision. However, the recall of the proposed algorithm, as shown in Figure 6(b1), got the best performance.…”
Section: The Performance Comparisons Between the Proposed Algorithm Amentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The main defect of block-based algorithms is the lack of the resisting of the scaling transforms. Wo et al [18] and Emam et al [7] proposed the polar complex exponential transform (PCET) with multi-radius block to extract the feature of each point. But, its efficiency is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMFD methods can be roughly divided into three main categories: block-based, keypoint-based and hybrid methods. The block-based methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] generally extract image features using invariant moment through overlapping block subdivided in rectangular regions. As an alternative to the CMFD, the keypoint-based methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] extract the features from the whole image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], Polar Cosine Transform (PCT) has been proposed to extract image block features, which could address the rotation problem. Eman et al [12] have proposed Polar Complex Exponential Transform (PCET) to extract the circle block features. However, most of block-based methods have inherent drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%