2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1098-3015(11)71989-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pcn94 Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin (Xelox) vs. 5-Fu/Lv + Oxaliplatin (Folfox4) in the Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Colon Cancer (Acc): Comparison of Direct Medical and Societal (Indirect) Costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The medical resources can be saved and the medical cost for colorectal cancer may decline as the result of decreased hospitalization stay. Moreover, Winterhalder reported Xelox is cost saving versus Folfox4, presenting the economic benefits of Xelox chemotherapy [ 37 ]. 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medical resources can be saved and the medical cost for colorectal cancer may decline as the result of decreased hospitalization stay. Moreover, Winterhalder reported Xelox is cost saving versus Folfox4, presenting the economic benefits of Xelox chemotherapy [ 37 ]. 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%