2020
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2020.1804221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCNA promotes context-specific sister chromatid cohesion establishment separate from that of chromatin condensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that several studies now point to the importance of both Eco1 and cohesin dimerization/clustering during the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and DNA loop formation, although other studies suggest that at least cohesins may act in monomeric form (Cattoglio et al, 2019; Shi et al, 2020; Kulemzina et al, 2012, Tong and Skibbens, 2014; Eng et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2008; Xiang and Koshland, 2021; Skibbens et al, 1999; Kim et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2020; Shi et al, 2020). As a final class of suppressors, ELG1 deletion and PCNA overexpression, both of which result in elevated levels of chromatin-bound PCNA, suppress eco1 mutant cell phenotypes through increased Eco1 recruitment to the DNA replication fork (Skibbens et al, 1999; Moldovan et al, 2006; Maradeo and Skibbens, 2010; Parnas et al, 2010; Song et al, 2012; Bender et al, 2020; Zuilkoski and Skibbens, 2020a). Cln2 appears distinct from each of these suppressor pathways and thus creates a new category of cohesin regulators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that several studies now point to the importance of both Eco1 and cohesin dimerization/clustering during the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and DNA loop formation, although other studies suggest that at least cohesins may act in monomeric form (Cattoglio et al, 2019; Shi et al, 2020; Kulemzina et al, 2012, Tong and Skibbens, 2014; Eng et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2008; Xiang and Koshland, 2021; Skibbens et al, 1999; Kim et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2020; Shi et al, 2020). As a final class of suppressors, ELG1 deletion and PCNA overexpression, both of which result in elevated levels of chromatin-bound PCNA, suppress eco1 mutant cell phenotypes through increased Eco1 recruitment to the DNA replication fork (Skibbens et al, 1999; Moldovan et al, 2006; Maradeo and Skibbens, 2010; Parnas et al, 2010; Song et al, 2012; Bender et al, 2020; Zuilkoski and Skibbens, 2020a). Cln2 appears distinct from each of these suppressor pathways and thus creates a new category of cohesin regulators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCNA overexpression in temperature-sensitive Eco1 mutants partially rescues viability and cohesion defects [ 59 , 158 ]. In line with this, the growth defects of a PCNA-binding mutant (Eco1 PIP ) can be rescued by fusing Eco1 PIP to Fen1 and (to a lesser extent) to Cdc9, which both function on the lagging strand in a late stage of DNA replication [ 89 ].…”
Section: Establishment Of Sister Chromatid Cohesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that loading at condensates sets a starting point to accumulate cohesin and recruit other factors that are required for cohesion maintenance (Figure 7). An interesting candidate for such a factor is the cohesin acetylase Eco1, which was previously shown to be recruitable by DNA-protein-cocondensates in other contexts (Zuilkoski & Skibbens, 2020). It is possbile that Scc2/4 is exchanged by these factors within the condensates once its task is fulfilled as it is known that Scc2/4 is not required for cohesion maintenance (Srinivasan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Ideas and Speculationmentioning
confidence: 99%