2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR-based DGGE fingerprinting and identification of methanogens detected in three different types of UASB granules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The biotic component, in casu the microbial community, can be investigated by molecular tools (Emanuelsson et al 2005;McMahon et al 2007). Up to now, a series of different tools were applied to evaluate the biotic dynamics based on molecular fingerprints: appearance or disappearance of discrete bands (Keyser et al 2006), the Dice index (Eichner et al 1999), nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (van Hannen et al 1999), principal component analysis (Boon et al 2002) and moving window analysis (Wittebolle et al 2005). However, many environmental engineers described stability almost entirely in terms of processes and functions, often failing to take into account the community component (Briones and Raskin 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biotic component, in casu the microbial community, can be investigated by molecular tools (Emanuelsson et al 2005;McMahon et al 2007). Up to now, a series of different tools were applied to evaluate the biotic dynamics based on molecular fingerprints: appearance or disappearance of discrete bands (Keyser et al 2006), the Dice index (Eichner et al 1999), nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (van Hannen et al 1999), principal component analysis (Boon et al 2002) and moving window analysis (Wittebolle et al 2005). However, many environmental engineers described stability almost entirely in terms of processes and functions, often failing to take into account the community component (Briones and Raskin 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These primers amplify the region between base pair 341 and 534 of the rRNA gene of E. coli (Muyzer et al, 1993), yielding 200 base pair (bp) fragments. The primers were selected on the basis of previous successful PCRbased DGGE analyses (Garbers et al, 2004;Keyser et al, 2006). PCR reactions contained ~30 ng (5 µl) of the template DNA, 1 µl of each primer (0.5 µM), 1 U Taq polymerase (ABGene, supplied by Southern Cross Biotechnology, Cape Town, South Africa), 2 µl dNTPs (200 µM) (Promega), 5 µl of the 10 x PCR buffer and 3 µl MgCl2 (2.5 mM) (ABGene, Southern Cross Biotechnology) in a total reaction volume of 50 µl.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Pcr-based Dgge Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, two-stage anaerobic digestion physically separates stages of digestion into separate reactors, allowing much better control over the anaerobic digestion process (Dinsdale et al 1996;Dugba and Zhang 1999;Shin et al 2010;Varel et al 1988;Vergara-Fernandez et al 2008;Yu et al 2002). Furthermore, molecular research underway is providing new insights into the microbial communities associated with the anaerobic digestion process and aim to understand the impact of internal environmental conditions and change within the digester community (Keyser et al 2006;Shin et al 2010;Supaphol et al 2011). For example, new molecular methods in the anaerobic digestion process (such as "poly chain reaction denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis" and "real time poly chain reaction") are under investigation to improve metabolic pathways within the digester and the abundance and species composition of bacterial populations (Patil et al 2010a, b;Shin et al 2010;Skilman et al 2009;Supaphol et al 2011;Ziganshin et al 2011).…”
Section: The Future Prospects Of Anaerobic Digestion In Microalgae Prmentioning
confidence: 99%