PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundStrawberry diseases are a major limiting factor that severely impact plant agronomic performance. Regarding limitations of traditional techniques for detection of pathogens, researchers have developed specific DNA-based tests as sensitive and specific techniques. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods used for detection or quantification of the most widespread strawberry pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. fragariae, Phytophthora fragariae, Colletotrichum acutatum, Verticillium dahliae, Botrytis cinerea, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Xanthomonas fragariae. An updated and detailed list of published PCR protocols is presented and discussed, aimed at facilitating access to information that could be particularly useful for diagnostic laboratories in order to develop a rapid, cost-effective, and reliable monitoring technique.MethodsThe study design was a systematic review of PCR-based techniques used for detection and quantification of strawberry pathogens. Using appropriate subject headings, AGRICOLA, AGRIS, BASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and SpringerLink databases were searched from their inception up to April 2014. Two assessors independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full articles of all identified citations. Selected articles were included if one of the mentioned strawberry pathogens was investigated based on PCR methods, and a summary of pre-analytical requirements for PCR was provided.ResultsA total of 259 titles and abstracts were reviewed, of which 22 full texts met all the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review identified ten different protocols for X. fragariae, eight for P. fragariae, four for B. cinerea, six for C. acutatum, three for V. dahlia, and only one for F. oxysporum. The accuracy and sensitivity of PCR diagnostic methods is the focus of most studies included in this review. However, a large proportion of errors in laboratories occur in the pre-analytical phase of the testing process. Due to heterogeneity, results could not be meta-analyzed.ConclusionsFrom a systematic review of the currently available published literature, effective detection assays to detect the major strawberry pathogens have been developed. These assays can function as a basis for clinical labs, regulatory personnel, and other diagnosticians to adapt or implement for detection of these six important strawberry pathogens.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The quest for understanding phenotypic variation via integrated approaches in the field environment

“…As a result, the genetic mapping of QTL can be performed with phenotype data obtained by successive measurement of a trait, such as height, throughout plant development, thereby enabling the expression dynamics of identified QTL to be monitored in the context of changing environmental conditions. and Bart, 2015), and these methods are widely employed (Ward et al, 2004;Lievens and Thomma, 2005;Mirmajlessi et al, 2015). The early detection of plant diseases prior to their spread remains the larger challenge.…”

Promising Perspectives for Detection, Identification, and Quantification of Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Oomycetes through Targeting Mitochondrial DNA

“…The major limitation of conventional PCR results from the requirement of time-consuming gel electrophoresis with visualization, which is not optimal for the detection of trace quantities of DNA due to its lower sensitivity [64]. In addition, the high risk of carry-over amplicons from previous amplification has been the main impediment to using PCR routinely in diagnostic laboratories [65][66][67]. More importantly, like other minor molecular techniques such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [68] and dot blot hybridization [69], conventional PCR does not provide quantitative data [70,71].…”

Recent developments in nanotechnology transforming the agricultural sector: a transition replete with opportunities

“…However, the most promising alternative is the application of real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR), which offers a specific, sensitive and rapid method for the diagnosis of plant pathogens in water, soil, air and plant samples. The most common disadvantage of Q‐PCR is the complex and time‐consuming sample preparation, and the lack of necessary facilities in rural areas –. Modern methods based on nucleic acids, biosensors, and immunological assays, allow rapid detection of pathogens, although they possess certain disadvantages including low selectivity and sensitivity as compared to the nanosensor methods .…”

“…The most common disadvantage of Q-PCR is the complex and time-consuming sample preparation, and the lack of necessary facilities in rural areas. [86][87][88] Modern methods based on nucleic acids, biosensors, 852 www.soci.org D-Y Kim et al…”