2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-008-1220-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR detection and sequencing of parasite ITS-rDNA gene from reservoirs host of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in central Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, nested PCR of ITS1-5.8S rDNA gene proved to be more sensitive for Leishmania species identification. This proved to be consistent with a number of previously obtained results ( Ajouad et al, 2013 , El Tai et al, 2000 , El Tai et al, 2001 , Spanakos et al, 2008 , Schallig and Oskam, 2002 , Parvizi et al, 2008 , Es-Sette et al, 2014 ). All of the cases studied were caused by L. tropica , a species endemic to the Aleppo region in Syria ( Saroufim et al, 2014 ) thus supporting the import of this species into Lebanon from across the Syrian borders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, nested PCR of ITS1-5.8S rDNA gene proved to be more sensitive for Leishmania species identification. This proved to be consistent with a number of previously obtained results ( Ajouad et al, 2013 , El Tai et al, 2000 , El Tai et al, 2001 , Spanakos et al, 2008 , Schallig and Oskam, 2002 , Parvizi et al, 2008 , Es-Sette et al, 2014 ). All of the cases studied were caused by L. tropica , a species endemic to the Aleppo region in Syria ( Saroufim et al, 2014 ) thus supporting the import of this species into Lebanon from across the Syrian borders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Iran and in some other countries [6,16,19,22]. In most of the earlier studies conducted in Iran, only L. major was isolated from great gerbils and characterized using isoenzyme or DNA-based molecular techniques [9,10,21]. In a study, which was conducted in the same area, only L. major was reported [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the detection of leishmanial infection in rodents, the investigation of biopsy/necropsy samples by PCR is more sensitive than the investigation of similar samples as smears or NO. AND (%) WITH PCR-POSITIVE: Foot/feet only 0 (0) 3 (3.1) 4 (19.0) 0 (0) Ear(s) only 0 (0) 4 (6.3) 3 (14.3) 0 (0) Liver only 0 (0) 2 (3.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) Spleen only 0 (0) 4 (6.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) Foot/feet and ear(s) only 0 (0) 2 (3.1) 2 (9.5) 0 (0) Foot/feet and liver only 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Foot/feet and spleen only 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Ear(s) and liver only 0 (0) 4 (6.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) Ear(s) and spleen only 0 (0) 1 (1.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) Spleen and liver only 0 (0) 4 (6.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) Ear(s), foot/feet and liver only 2 (67) 2 (3.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) Ear(s), spleen and liver only 0 (0) 6 (9.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) Ear(s), foot/feet and spleen only 1 (33) 3 (4.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) Ear(s), foot/feet, spleen and liver 0 (0) 1 (4.8) 0 (0) 0 (0) by culture (Nicolas et al, 2002;Oliveira et al, 2005;Parvizi et al, 2008). Even though the samples investigated in the present study had been formalin-fixed, the overall prevalence of L. major detected (52.8%) was markedly higher than the value (16.2%) estimated, using microscopy and culture, for rodents caught elsewhere in southern Iran (Motazedian et al, 2006;Mehrabani et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%