2017
DOI: 10.1172/jci94196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PD-L1 serves as a double agent in separating GVL from GVHD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary clinical approach to treating GVHD after allogeneic BMT is immunosuppression (7). However, immunosuppression also increases risk of infection; compromises graft viability; and, in the case of HSCT as part of cancer therapy, can dampen graft-versus-tumor activity (60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66). Thus, there is an urgent need for alternate approaches to prevent GVHD development or reduce its severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary clinical approach to treating GVHD after allogeneic BMT is immunosuppression (7). However, immunosuppression also increases risk of infection; compromises graft viability; and, in the case of HSCT as part of cancer therapy, can dampen graft-versus-tumor activity (60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66). Thus, there is an urgent need for alternate approaches to prevent GVHD development or reduce its severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both HLA‐mismatched HSCT and DLI have a stronger antitumor effect than HLA‐matched HSCT, but they may also bring a greater risk of GVHD, one of the fatal complications after HSCT . Therefore, efforts have been made over the last 2 decades to explore the difference between the mechanism of GVT and GVHD and to design strategies to separate GVT from GVHD . One important difference is that the threshold number of T cells triggering GVT is relatively lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(31)(32)(33)(34) Therefore, efforts have been made over the last 2 decades to explore the difference between the mechanism of GVT and GVHD and to design strategies to separate GVT from GVHD. (35,36) One important difference is that the threshold number of T cells triggering GVT is relatively lower. This assumption is supported by clinical experience that low-dose DLI is generally sufficient to reduce the risk of relapse of the tumor without GVHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of MHC and miHC antigens in GVL is underlined by the close association between GVHD and GVL, although selective miHC antigens are considered to be attractive targets for anti-leukemia immunotherapy. More recently, a number of studies have demonstrated that the overall balance between regulatory cells, including Treg, MDSC, and effector cells might be related to the extent of organ damage in GVHD settings and the effects of GVL in anti-leukemia settings (Figures 1– 3 ) (21, 22, 25, 52, 53, 57).…”
Section: Mechanisms Relevant To Gvhd and Gvl Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge for the separation of GVL effects from GVHD is attributed to the underlying similarity of the alloreactive T responses between the two processes (4, 21, 22). In the past 20 years, great efforts have been made by researchers to elucidate specific distinguishing immune mechanisms of GVL vs. GVHD (2325).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%