2021
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001966.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pd02-03 assessing the Educational Impact of 3d Printed Models on Resident, Fellow, and Patient Education for Partial Nephrectomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Scott et al [8], demonstrated a low-cost FFF kidney model which separated into two parts to makevisible a tumor. However, this approach does not fully reveal the internal anatomy of the kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Scott et al [8], demonstrated a low-cost FFF kidney model which separated into two parts to makevisible a tumor. However, this approach does not fully reveal the internal anatomy of the kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common advantages of MJP include the use of transparent material (revealing the internal geometry) and dissolvable support material allowing detailed features to be easily cleaned [3, 7]. Other work has investigated low cost FFF methods [7, 8], but have not been able to create models of equivalent utility to the state-of-the-art. For example, Scott et al [8], demonstrated a low-cost FFF kidney model which separated into two parts to make-visible a tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations