2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1098-3015(10)73578-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pdb35 Medication Non-Adherence and Non-Persistence in a Managed Care Diabetes Mellitus Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCI differs from the Charlson comorbidity index with respect to data source (drug vs. medical claims) and the medical conditions which they assess (5). 7 In addition, for the secondary analysis investigating the determinants of medication adherence, we defined: Cost per day of therapy defined as the average out-of-pocket copayment paid by the patient for one day of drug therapy, dose per day defined as the average number of pills prescribed during a treatment 6 Although this has become a convention in the adherence literature, this cut-off level has never been empirically validated for diabetes, and in fact Karve et al (2009) suggest that a level of 89% may be more applicable to predict all-cause hospitalization for diabetes patients (16). 7 The PCI is especially more sensitive to mental conditions than the Charlson index.…”
Section: Other Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCI differs from the Charlson comorbidity index with respect to data source (drug vs. medical claims) and the medical conditions which they assess (5). 7 In addition, for the secondary analysis investigating the determinants of medication adherence, we defined: Cost per day of therapy defined as the average out-of-pocket copayment paid by the patient for one day of drug therapy, dose per day defined as the average number of pills prescribed during a treatment 6 Although this has become a convention in the adherence literature, this cut-off level has never been empirically validated for diabetes, and in fact Karve et al (2009) suggest that a level of 89% may be more applicable to predict all-cause hospitalization for diabetes patients (16). 7 The PCI is especially more sensitive to mental conditions than the Charlson index.…”
Section: Other Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%