PDON: Parkinson’s disease ontology for representation and modeling of the Parkinson’s disease knowledge domain

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the unprecedented and increasing amount of data, relatively little progress has been made in molecular characterization of mechanisms underlying Parkinson’s disease. In the area of Parkinson’s research, there is a pressing need to integrate various pieces of information into a meaningful context of presumed disease mechanism(s). Disease ontologies provide a novel means for organizing, integrating, and standardizing the knowledge domains specific to disease in a compact, formalized and computer-readable form and serve as a reference for knowledge exchange or systems modeling of disease mechanism.MethodsThe Parkinson’s disease ontology was built according to the life cycle of ontology building. Structural, functional, and expert evaluation of the ontology was performed to ensure the quality and usability of the ontology. A novelty metric has been introduced to measure the gain of new knowledge using the ontology. Finally, a cause-and-effect model was built around PINK1 and two gene expression studies from the Gene Expression Omnibus database were re-annotated to demonstrate the usability of the ontology.ResultsThe Parkinson’s disease ontology with a subclass-based taxonomic hierarchy covers the broad spectrum of major biomedical concepts from molecular to clinical features of the disease, and also reflects different views on disease features held by molecular biologists, clinicians and drug developers. The current version of the ontology contains 632 concepts, which are organized under nine views. The structural evaluation showed the balanced dispersion of concept classes throughout the ontology. The functional evaluation demonstrated that the ontology-driven literature search could gain novel knowledge not present in the reference Parkinson’s knowledge map. The ontology was able to answer specific questions related to Parkinson’s when evaluated by experts. Finally, the added value of the Parkinson’s disease ontology is demonstrated by ontology-driven modeling of PINK1 and re-annotation of gene expression datasets relevant to Parkinson’s disease.ConclusionsParkinson’s disease ontology delivers the knowledge domain of Parkinson’s disease in a compact, computer-readable form, which can be further edited and enriched by the scientific community and also to be used to construct, represent and automatically extend Parkinson’s-related computable models. A practical version of the Parkinson’s disease ontology for browsing and editing can be publicly accessed at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/PDON.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12976-015-0017-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Neuroimaging Feature Terminology: A Controlled Terminology for the Annotation of Brain Imaging Features

“…In the presence of other terminology sources, powerful filtering for faceted searches can be implemented. For instance, we can combine NIFT with HypothesisFinder [ 74 ] to systematically harvest speculative statements linked to imaging features; or combination of NIFT terms with ADO terms will allow us to systematically harvest factual statements that link imaging readouts to aspects of AD progression in literature; and finally, we also have the possibility of mining “shared imaging features” amongst other diseases by making use of the already integrated Parkinson Disease Ontology [ 75 ] and Multiple Sclerosis Ontology [ 76 ]. This could lead to domain specific imaging feature identification across disease scales.…”

Developing Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology: Moving Towards Data Harmonization and Integration

“…The ontology of heart electrophysiology has been developed based on METHONTOLOGY and according to the ontology life cycle [25]. This is an accepted method in the construction of many developed ontologies [26][27][28]. In this study, Initially, EP ontology domain and scope were clearly defined using needs assessment techniques in some focus group meetings with cardiologists and Health Information Management (HIM) experts.…”

Bioinformatics Mining and Modeling Methods for the Identification of Disease Mechanisms in Neurodegenerative Disorders

“…OpenBEL focuses on causal and correlative relationships; use of the language is supported by a dedicated OpenBEL framework that provides essential analysis tools and algorithms [ 63 ]. One advantage of BEL over existing modeling languages is explicit support of semantics using domain-specific ontologies, which makes the encoding of biomedical features specific to neurodegeneration feasible by utilizing resources such as Alzheimer’s disease ontology [ 64 ] and Parkinson’s disease ontology [ 65 ].…”

“…Curated data represent molecular (“omics”) entities and their interaction and clinical data (including trial data). A comprehensive, semantic framework representing and formalising knowledge about anatomy (FMA [ 113 ], BRCO [ 114 ], NIF [ 115 ]), about major neurodegenerative diseases (ADO [ 64 ], PDON [ 65 ], MSO [ 116 ]) and about assays and readouts (variables) used in clinical trials (NDD-CTO [ 117 ]; NIFT [ 118 ]; clinicaltrials.gov [ 119 ]) enables “shared semantics” over all scales (from the molecular via the cellular and organ level to the cohort and population level) and all entity types (ranging from genes and proteins to cognitive testing and neuro-imaging).…”