1964
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1964.tb00722.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PEA APHID BIOTYPES DIFFERING IN BEAN YELLOW MOSAIC VIRUS TRANSMISSION1

Abstract: Two pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)) biotypes were isolated which differed greatly in efficiency of bean yellow mosaic virus transmission. The two biotypes ranked differently in efficiency of bean yellow mosaic virus transmission among eight other aphid species, including three species not previously reported as vectors of bean yellow mosaic virus. These new vectors are Brachycaudus helichrysi (Kltb.), Cavariella aegopodii (Scop.), and Therioaphis riehmi (Börner). These biotypes also differed consisten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
1
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, a continuous transmission efficiency gradient with 10-fold difference between the least and the most efficient clones was determined. Transmission efficiency differences were also observed under controlled test conditions using a lower number of clones: Sohi & Swenson (1964) obtained up to 5-fold difference between 8 clones of A. pisum for the transmission of BYMV; Upreti & Nagaich (1971) and Singh etal. (1983) obtained 4 to 5-fold difference between 13 clones of Myzus persicae Sulzer using different PVY strains; with A. gossypii, Simons (1959;1966) obtained up to 10-fold difference between 3 and 11 clones using CMV and PVY, while Singh et al (1983) observed only 1 to 4-fold difference between 5 clones using 2 PVY strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, a continuous transmission efficiency gradient with 10-fold difference between the least and the most efficient clones was determined. Transmission efficiency differences were also observed under controlled test conditions using a lower number of clones: Sohi & Swenson (1964) obtained up to 5-fold difference between 8 clones of A. pisum for the transmission of BYMV; Upreti & Nagaich (1971) and Singh etal. (1983) obtained 4 to 5-fold difference between 13 clones of Myzus persicae Sulzer using different PVY strains; with A. gossypii, Simons (1959;1966) obtained up to 10-fold difference between 3 and 11 clones using CMV and PVY, while Singh et al (1983) observed only 1 to 4-fold difference between 5 clones using 2 PVY strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The transmission of a certain virus by a given aphid species depends on the genetic properties of the virus and the aphid, and factors related to the transmission itself (aphid behaviour, virus concentration in the source plants, ...). Nonpersistent viruses can be transmitted by many aphid species, either in the laboratory (Sohi & Swenson, 1964;Markham et al, 1987) or in the field (Harrington etaL, 1986;Labonne etal., 1982;Raccah, 1986). However their transmission efficiencies differ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-clonal variation in virus transmission by aphids has been reported for both stylet-borne (Sohi and Swenson 1964;Thottappilly et al, 1972;Jurik et al, 1980;Singh et al, 1983;Lupoli et al, 1992) and circulative viruses (Bjo¨rling and Ossiannilsson, 1958;Robert and Maury 1970;Guo et al, 1996Guo et al, , 1997a. In most cases, variations in the virus-transmitting abilities of different clones were detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, feeds on a variety of agriculturally relevant crop plants in the Fabaceae, including soybean (Glycine max), fava/broad bean (Vicia faba), pea (Pisum sativum), and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) (15,28,(34)(35)(36), and has been shown to vector bean yellow mosaic virus between these hosts (15,(34)(35)(36). Several of these plants are also primary hosts for the highly aggressive bean pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it traverses the plant surface, the aphid continually evaluates the suitability of the host, with some aphid species sampling plant fluids with droplets of saliva that are expelled and reingested (3). This saliva can contact the plant surface where many bacterial epiphytes reside, such as the ubiquitous phytopathogens Pantoea agglomerans and Pseudomonas syringae (4,5,10,21,22,32).The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, feeds on a variety of agriculturally relevant crop plants in the Fabaceae, including soybean (Glycine max), fava/broad bean (Vicia faba), pea (Pisum sativum), and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) (15,28,(34)(35)(36), and has been shown to vector bean yellow mosaic virus between these hosts (15,(34)(35)(36). Several of these plants are also primary hosts for the highly aggressive bean pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%