Peace and war: Rewarding intergroup contacts make past intergroup aggression unforgivable.

Li, Chenchen; Li, Dongmei; Huang, Ziying; Chiu, Chi‐yue

doi:10.1037/pac0000140

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence that contact effects generalize to secondary outgroups has been obtained mainly with correlational (Brylka, Jasinskaja‐Lahti, & Mähönen, 2016; Hindriks et al., 2014; Pettigrew, 2009; Vezzali et al., 2019, 24 studies, see Table 3), but also with longitudinal (Bowman & Griffin, 2012; Mähönen & Jasinskaja‐Lahti, 2016; Tausch et al., 2010, Study 4; Turner & Feddes, 2011; Van Laar et al., 2005, seven studies, see Table 2), and experimental methodologies (Harwood et al., 2011; Jasinskaja‐Lahti et al., 2020; Li et al., 2016; Shook et al., 2016; but see Mark & Harris, 2012, 13 studies see Tables 1; note that the study by Van Laar et al., [2005] has been included both as an experimental and a longitudinal study, see Tables 1 and 2).…”

Section: Intergroup Contact and The Secondary Transfer Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reducing prejudice in the society at large: A review of the secondary transfer effect and directions for future research

Vezzali

Bernardo

Cocco

et al. 2021

Social & Personality Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The secondary transfer effect (STE) constitutes the generalization of the effects of intergroup contact from the outgroup one has contact with to uninvolved outgroups. In this article, we provide a review of the research on the STE. After presenting evidence on the robustness of the phenomenon, we discuss relevant mediating processes and outline a model that distinguishes them in three categories: mediators referring to the outgroup, mediators referring to the ingroup, and mediators referring to the self. We then present moderators of the STE, and recent evidence of the STE from indirect contact (extended, vicarious, and imagined contact) and from negative contact. By relying on our distinction in three sets of mediators, we suggest directions for future research, largely pointing to the importance of integrating the STE with research on generalized prejudice and of exploring contact as an agent of cognitive liberalization.

show abstract

Section: Intergroup Contact and The Secondary Transfer Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reducing prejudice in the society at large: A review of the secondary transfer effect and directions for future research

Vezzali

Bernardo

Cocco

et al. 2021

Social & Personality Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The first of these tensions—inclusive and exclusive orientations—are explained through intergroup theory (Brown & Hewstone, 2005; Mackie & Smith, 1998; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner et al, 1979), which has been used as a descriptive framework for peacebuilding activity (Gurrentz & Finke, 2017; Joseph et al, 2020; Kolade, 2018; C. Li et al, 2016; Tobias & Boudreaux, 2011; Tobias et al, 2013).…”

Section: Examining the Paradox And Underlying Tensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurship, Conflict, and Peace: The Role of Inclusion and Value Creation

Joseph

Buren

2021

Business & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflict zone entrepreneurs—local entrepreneurs running small businesses in conflict settings—have paradoxical impacts on stability: holding the ability both to foster peace but also to enhance conflict. Prior scholarly work has been unable to explain this divergence, as existing entrepreneurial indicators do not account for fundamental peacebuilding elements. In response, the article consolidates divergent fields of study, applies paradox theory to analyze underlying tensions in the field, and reframes entrepreneurship through a peacebuilding lens based on intergroup inclusivity and value-creating business practices. Using several cases, this article shows how entrepreneurial activity in conflict zones can foster sustainable peace, limited peace, or conflict, arguing that entrepreneurship based on value-creating and inclusive practices can result in pro-peace outcomes. The article offers policy recommendations for local governments and the humanitarian sector seeking to use entrepreneurship in conflict zones to promote peace.

show abstract

“…Buena parte de las investigaciones sobre la guerra y la violencia acuden a esta metodología, con la cual se ha establecido la influencia de diferentes factores en las respuestas de las personas. Entre las variables estudiadas se encuentra el género (Brooks & Valentino, 2011), la orientación política y religiosa (Friese, Fishman, Beatson, Sauerwein, & Rip, 2009;Shaw, Quezada, & Zárate, 2011), las diferencias culturales e identificación grupal (Van der Linden, Bizumic, Stubager, & Mellon, 2011;Bobowik, y otros, 2014;Li, Li, Huang, & Chiu, 2015) y los rasgos de personalidad (Crowson, 2009;Dunwoody, Plane, Trescher, & Rice, 2014;Sundberg, 2014), sin desconocer las ventajas que supone este tipo de metodología, usualmente las investigaciones se agotan en el análisis estadístico entre variables o la descripción de opiniones y reacciones positivas o negativas frente a la guerra, sin comprometerse con discusiones más amplias sobre el rol que cumplen las creencias o concepciones morales en la decisión de dañar a otros.…”

Section: éTica Para Limitar Las Accionesunclassified

Principios morales de la guerra: Actitudes frente a la transgresión

Hernández

Canal

2017

RIP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La posibilidad de implementar reglas que regulen las acciones armadas en tiempo de guerra exige una comprensión más amplia de los factores implicados en el respeto o la transgresión de los límites morales establecidos por el derecho internacional humanitario. En el presente estudio se exploran las actitudes frente a un conjunto de conductas y estrategias militares empleadas en la guerra, así como de los factores que pueden dar lugar a un cambio en dichas actitudes. Se contó con la participación de una muestra de 169 personas, conformado por desmovilizados de grupos armados ilegales de Colombia (FARC y AUC), fuerza pública y estudiantes universitarios. Tras el análisis de los resultados, se concluye que las diferencias de grupo y las valoraciones sobre los objetivos de las acciones militares influyen en las actitudes frente a los actos de guerra.

show abstract

Peace and war: Rewarding intergroup contacts make past intergroup aggression unforgivable.

Cited by 7 publications

References 1 publication

Reducing prejudice in the society at large: A review of the secondary transfer effect and directions for future research

Reducing prejudice in the society at large: A review of the secondary transfer effect and directions for future research

Entrepreneurship, Conflict, and Peace: The Role of Inclusion and Value Creation

Principios morales de la guerra: Actitudes frente a la transgresión

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About