High-Rise Buildings Under Multi-Hazard Environment 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-1744-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak Distributions and Peak Factors of Wind-Induced Pressure Processes on Tall Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, Gaussian approximations yield non-conservative estimates of the PF values when applied to non-Gaussian processes (Kareem and Zhao 1994), and different approximate models have been developed to estimate the PF statistics of non-Gaussian processes (Huang et al 2013; Kareem and Zhao 1994; Kwon and Kareem 2011; Sadek and Simiu 2002). Very few studies available in the literature investigated the PFs and their statistics for hyperbolic paraboloid roofs (HPRs) (Liu et al 2016(Liu et al , 2017Rizzo et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, Gaussian approximations yield non-conservative estimates of the PF values when applied to non-Gaussian processes (Kareem and Zhao 1994), and different approximate models have been developed to estimate the PF statistics of non-Gaussian processes (Huang et al 2013; Kareem and Zhao 1994; Kwon and Kareem 2011; Sadek and Simiu 2002). Very few studies available in the literature investigated the PFs and their statistics for hyperbolic paraboloid roofs (HPRs) (Liu et al 2016(Liu et al , 2017Rizzo et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rizzo et al (2018) investigated the non-Gaussianity of the pressure coefficient processes for a square HPR through a comparison between experimental measures and analytical estimates of PF statistics. They observed that: (1) the distribution of non-Gaussian regions strongly depend on the wind angle, (2) the Davenport model systematically underestimates the PF mean and standard deviation in highly non-Gaussian regions, (3) moment-based Hermite models provide accurate estimates of the PF mean, and (4) the Translated-Peak-Process (TPP) model (Huang et al 2013) seems to provide the best estimates of the PF standard deviation. Rizzo et al (2018) also observed that the local variability of the pressure coefficient peaks is best described by a Weibull distribution, as assumed by the TPP model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e object of extreme wind pressure estimation can be the parent distribution or the extracted extreme value distribution. When focusing on the parent distribution, the analysis will be carried out with the help of the Hermite polynomial transformation from Gaussian distribution to non-Gaussian distribution [3] and the cumulative probability function [4,5]. e main representatives are the peak factor method [6] proposed by Davenport in 1964 and the follow-up revised methods [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the mentioned issues, the study and analysis of tall structures under the wind pressure influence is necessary to ensure the safety and well-being of cities' residents . For example, pressure and suction caused by wind in various aspects of high-rise structures is an effective parameter in architectural and structural design of high-rise buildings (Huang, 2017;Cao et al, 2009). The pressure and suction resulted from the wind is a kind of random loading that depends on various parameters, such as structural shape, structural dimensions, environmental density, wind potentials and architectural and structural characteristics of the building (Lin et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%