2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.144512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak effect and square-to-rhombic vortex lattice transition inLa2xSrxCuO4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
10
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, based on the scenario (ii), Hsp corresponds to the phase transition field of the vortex lattice from the rhombic to the square structure. In Region (II), the vortex lattice softens as H approaches to Hsp, and the vortices are pinned more easily, resulting in increasing Jc [57]. In the following we briefly examine whether and how one can explain the present results based on the above scenarios.…”
Section: T) Region (Ii): Between Hon(t) -Hsp(t) Region (Iii): Betwementioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, based on the scenario (ii), Hsp corresponds to the phase transition field of the vortex lattice from the rhombic to the square structure. In Region (II), the vortex lattice softens as H approaches to Hsp, and the vortices are pinned more easily, resulting in increasing Jc [57]. In the following we briefly examine whether and how one can explain the present results based on the above scenarios.…”
Section: T) Region (Ii): Between Hon(t) -Hsp(t) Region (Iii): Betwementioning
confidence: 87%
“…La 2−x Sr x CuO 4 , with x = 0.126 and similar doping, exhibits a broad SMP with characteristics that are strongly temperature dependent down to low temperature [52,56]. This behavior was explained by considering the softening of the vortex lattice associated with the square to rhombic vortex lattice transition as the source for the SMP [20,52]. Alternatively, the upward curvature in the T dependence of H on and H p in the low-T region may be explained as a dynamic effect caused by the finite current j s induced in the specimen during standard dc magnetization experiments, which reduces the effective pinning energy U (j s , T, H) [57].…”
Section: Phase Diagram and Second Magnetization Peakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Fundamentally speaking, the mechanism and the origin of this effect is still much debated partly because it is system dependent with classification predominantly determined by superconducting anisotropy. [5][6][7][8][9][10] So far, flux-dynamics studies of the second magnetization peak in iron pnictides were performed on the systems, SmFeAsO 0.9 F 0.1 with T c = 55 K where the authors inferred weak and collective pinning, 11 NdFeAsO 0.85 ͑Ref. 12͒ and Ba͑Fe 1−x Co x ͒ 2 As 2 , the most studied system, where the peak effect appears only for samples near optimally doping [13][14][15][16][17][18] and weak and collective pinning are claimed in most of the works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%