2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak HIV prevalence: a useful outcome variable for ecological studies

Abstract: Background Correctly identifying the determinants of generalized HIV epidemics is crucial to bringing down ongoing high HIV incidence in many of these countries. High rates of migration are believed by some to be an important determinant of HIV prevalence. This study evaluates the ecological association between levels of internal and international migration and peak HIV prevalence using thirteen variables from a variety of sources to capture various aspects of internal and international migration intensity. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus on the measurement of migration, but of course there are methodological challenges to measuring both HIV/STI (56) and sexual risk behavior (60). An in-depth discussion of these measures is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We focus on the measurement of migration, but of course there are methodological challenges to measuring both HIV/STI (56) and sexual risk behavior (60). An in-depth discussion of these measures is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelers have to be careful in selecting outcomes that avoid this fallacy. In a recent paper, Kenyon et al demonstrate how spurious associations may be drawn, and existing associations missed, when outcome measures are incorrectly chosen; in particular, they argue that peak HIV prevalence as an outcome might be better in avoiding bias due to time of introduction of the virus, than HIV prevalence (56). …”
Section: Study Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility of peak HIV prevalence as a means of comparing different HIV epidemics has been detailed elsewhere. 18,19 (2) 'Pre-peak-HIV syphilis prevalence' defined as the syphilis prevalence in the country from the first year this was measured. (3) 'Post-peak-HIV syphilis prevalence' defined as the nadir of syphilis prevalence reached in the period after the year that HIV prevalence reached its peak prevalence.…”
Section: Syphilis Prevalence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“It must be borne in mind that HIV prevalence at a point in time represents the cumulative effect of behaviours over the preceding decade and longer [41]. Differences in current HIV prevalence therefore reflect the cumulative effect of behaviours over the preceding years.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%