2018
DOI: 10.1111/sms.13307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak oxygen uptake cut‐points to identify children at increased cardiometabolic risk – The PANIC Study

Abstract: We aimed to develop cut-points for directly measured peak oxygen uptake ( ) to identify boys and girls at increased cardiometabolic risk using different scaling methods to control for body size and composition. Altogether 352 children (186 boys, 166 girls) aged 9-11 years were included in the analyses. We measured V̇O directly during a maximal cycle ergometer exercise test and lean body mass (LM) by bioelectrical impedance. We computed a sex- and age-specific cardiometabolic risk score (CRS) by summing importa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the multicollinearity, we excluded BF% from the model regarding WC. Finally, we included CRF together with sex and peak height velocity in further linear regression models, because increased CRF has been associated with increased HRV and decreased cardiometabolic risk factors . We also studied whether the associations of CRS and individual cardiometabolic risk factors with HRV variables were different between boys and girls by adding an interaction term for CRS and individual cardiometabolic risk factors in the linear regression models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the multicollinearity, we excluded BF% from the model regarding WC. Finally, we included CRF together with sex and peak height velocity in further linear regression models, because increased CRF has been associated with increased HRV and decreased cardiometabolic risk factors . We also studied whether the associations of CRS and individual cardiometabolic risk factors with HRV variables were different between boys and girls by adding an interaction term for CRS and individual cardiometabolic risk factors in the linear regression models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased body fat content, but not peak oxygen uptake ( O 2peak ) determined during an incremental exercise test, has been found to be strongly related to insulin resistance (19). Therefore, the assessment of CRF using measures scaled by BM using the ratio standard method or the 20-metre shuttle run test may lead to spurious associations with insulin resistance (20,21). Allometric scaling of CRF by lean body mass (LM) has been recommended to account for variation in body size and composition among children and adolescents (19,22), but few studies have utilised this approach to explore the associations of CRF with fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations with adjustment for adiposity.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W max /BM 1 had a strong inverse association with BM (β = -0.498, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.584 to -0.412, p < 0.001) and W max /LM 1 had a weak positive association with LM (β = 0.086, 95% CI=0.003 to 0.169, p = 0.043) indicating that ratio scaling by BM -1 or LM -1 did not completely remove the effect of body size on CRF. Therefore, allometric scaling of W max was performed by log-linear regression models (20). The scaling exponent for BM was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.39 to 0.57) and for it LM was 1.13 (95% CI = 1.01 to 1.26).…”
Section: Assessment Of Cardiorespiratory Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined cardiorespiratory fitness as the maximal power output (W max ) defined as the workload at the end of the exercise test scaled by BW ‐1 and allometrically scaled W max by BW ‐0.35 , because W max /BW ‐1 had a strong inverse association with BW (β=−0.587, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.782 to −0.392, p < .001) indicating that ratio scaling by BW ‐1 was not able to remove the effect of body size on cardiorespiratory fitness. Therefore, allometric scaling of W max was performed by log‐linear regression models (Agbaje et al., 2019). The scaling exponent for BM was 0.35 (95% CI = 0.14 to 0.56).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%