2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2021.3103650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak Wave Direction Measurement Using Shipboard Coherent Microwave Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a drawback of non-coherent MRs is the need for a modulation transfer function (MTF) to calibrate the radar spectrum and get a reliable estimation of the sea state parameters (significant wave height, period, and wavelength) [17], [22], [23]. Differently from non-coherent MRs, coherent systems take into account also the phase of signal or the target radial velocity (Doppler shift), from which it is possible to retrieve the significant wave height and 2D directional spectra, and quantify some physical characteristics of the sea wave [24], [25]. Moreover, coherent MRs do not require the calibration of the radar spectrum needed by non-coherent systems [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a drawback of non-coherent MRs is the need for a modulation transfer function (MTF) to calibrate the radar spectrum and get a reliable estimation of the sea state parameters (significant wave height, period, and wavelength) [17], [22], [23]. Differently from non-coherent MRs, coherent systems take into account also the phase of signal or the target radial velocity (Doppler shift), from which it is possible to retrieve the significant wave height and 2D directional spectra, and quantify some physical characteristics of the sea wave [24], [25]. Moreover, coherent MRs do not require the calibration of the radar spectrum needed by non-coherent systems [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%