“…First described in desert grasses, rhizosheath formation has since been reported in many cereal crops including sorghum and pearl millet (Brown et al, 2017; Duell & Peacock, 1985; P. M. S. Ndour et al, 2017). A positive impact of the rhizosheath on water and mineral nutrition was reported for several plants in laboratory conditions and could be partly explained by improved contact between the soil and the root surface (P. M. S. Ndour et al, 2020). Phenotyping for rhizosheath size is high throughput and this trait is largely under plant genetic control and large variability exists in the germplasm in pearl millet thus making it a potential target for breeding (P. M. S. Ndour et al, 2021) even if it seems to be under complex genetic control in pearl millet (de la Fuente Canto et al, submitted). As rhizosheath formation is positively correlated with root hair length in wheat and barley, QTLs increasing root hair length and/or density to improve P capture could also indirectly improve rhizosheath formation (Delhaize et al, 2015; George et al, 2014). However, rhizosheath formation could represent a significant carbon sink, and further work is needed to demonstrate the impact of a larger rhizosheath on dryland cereals in West African field conditions.…”