“…The Fe 2p 3/2 of MFO in Figure b was fitted into three peaks at 710.8, 712.6, and 718.2 eV corresponding to Fe 3+ at the octahedral site, the tetrahedral site, and the shakeup satellite peak, respectively. , In Figure c, the O 1s spectrum of MFO at 529.8, 531.1, and 532.6 eV can be assigned to metal–oxygen bonds, oxygen vacancies, , and surface-adsorbed oxygen, respectively. For PAN-MFO 2/1, the intensity of pyridinic N peak reduces sharply, a new strong peak at 399.3 eV can be observed (Figure d); meanwhile, an extra peak appears at 706 eV in the Fe 2p spectrum (Figure e), implying the pyridinic N in PAN interacts with Fe in MFO to form an Fe–N bond. , The percentage of oxygen vacancies in PAN-MFO 2/1 (Figure f, 62.2%) increases significantly compared with that of MFO (Figure c, 28.1%), which is consistent with the result of EPR. Meanwhile, the peaks of Fe 3+ (Figure e) and metal–oxygen bond (Figure f) in PAN-MFO 2/1 both shift to lower binding energy, illustrating the weakened Fe–O bond, which is consistent with the results of the Raman and FTIR.…”