2019
DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PEARLS for Systems Integration

Abstract: Summary Statement Modern healthcare organizations strive for continuous improvement in systems and processes to ensure safe, effective, and cost-conscious patient care. However, systems failures and inefficiencies lurk in every organization, often emerging only after patients have experienced harm or delays. Simulation and debriefing, focused on identifying systems gaps, can proactively lead to improvements in safety and quality. Systems-focused debriefing requires a different approach than tradition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the simulation, the participants engaged in a focused debrief using a PEARLS learner-focused approach and then used PEARLS for systems integration at the end of each debriefing to target specific systems pre-determined objectives. (Eppich & Cheng, 2015;Dubé et al, 2019b). This blended approach, which was used throughout the province for COVID-19 SBE (Dubé et al, 2020a), allowed the facilitators to identify debriefing topics while providing actionable steps for local implementation and improvement ( Table 2).…”
Section: Debriefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the simulation, the participants engaged in a focused debrief using a PEARLS learner-focused approach and then used PEARLS for systems integration at the end of each debriefing to target specific systems pre-determined objectives. (Eppich & Cheng, 2015;Dubé et al, 2019b). This blended approach, which was used throughout the province for COVID-19 SBE (Dubé et al, 2020a), allowed the facilitators to identify debriefing topics while providing actionable steps for local implementation and improvement ( Table 2).…”
Section: Debriefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standardized scenario of pediatric anaphylaxis performed in 28 international hospitals identified a high medication error rate, and the postevent debriefings revealed a common LST across institutions related to decision support aids [51]. Learning opportunities from these system-focused simulations can be maximized by using a specific debriefing framework such as PEARLS for system integration [16] which is based on Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0, a human-factors model of patient safety and the healthcare system [93].…”
Section: Systems Quality Improvement and Patient Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, participants were asked to give feedback on the processes in infection control within the respective settings after the simulation that were enablers or barriers to patient and staff safety. 17 The pre-briefing script was also crafted to build psychological safety to enhance learning. 15 Prior to engaging in the simulation scenario, participants viewed two videos of teams conducting airway management for a confirmed patient with COVID-19-one with ideal performance and other with behaviours that could be improved.…”
Section: Simulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 To achieve goals of process testing and system integration, the participants were orientated at the beginning of the simulation to the system testing purposes of the simulation, and also be given the opportunity of expressing their thoughts and concerns about the processes in infection control within the respective settings. 17 Close collaboration and communication were maintained with the infection-control team, which was responsible for the development of guidelines and workflow processes for infection control within operating theatre and ICU. Results from system testing were documented and fed back to the infection-control team for modification of the workflow processes iteratively, and retested in the simulation setting until saturation was reached.…”
Section: Simulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%