Massach usetts 02138
INTRODUCTIONDespite his antiquity, the miner, like Geertz ' s peasant, was recently discovered by anthropologists. This discovery, not fortuitously , came when the energy and environmental crisis made us all aware of the finite supply of nonrenewable naturaI resources and the limits of industrial growth. If interest in mining came late, systematic studies of mining have yet to arr ive. Paraphrasing Geertz , one is not likely to find ideas, much less a coherent system of ideas, in anthropolo gical studies of mining.The aims of this essa y are: (a) to review the anthropological literature on mining, drawing att ention to the contributions of neighboring disciplines, and (b) to identify promising avenues for future research. The review deals with bard, nonfuel minerals. Oil, gas, coal, and uranium are dealt with only incidentally. Stress is placed on the extractive and not on the process ing or marlcetiog stages for the sake of coherence and brevity.1be review is divided into three sections. The first deals with mineral economics; the second contains a discuss ion of the demographic, social, and political characteristics of mining communities; the final section involves mining rituals, beliefs, and ideology. Implicit in this tripartite division is a view of mining consisting of an economic base and a derivative sociopolitical and ideological superstru cture.
THE ECONOMICS OF MININGMining is a process composed of three major, logical, interr elated, and sequen tial phases: exploration, development, and production (189). Unique risks, economic considerations, and constraints characterize each stage. Further ANNUAL REVIEWS 200 GODOY Exploration Exploration is the most important phase of a mining venture because most of the value added of a mineral deposit occurs at the moment of discovery. Most orebodies currently under exploitation were discovered through, and grew out of, enterprises initiated by small-scale producers (10, 151, 182). The strategies used by these people in locating deposits remain unknown. Phimister (155) discusses the formulas followed by the Shona of Southern Zambezia for finding reef outcrops. Arnold (5) probes the cognitive distinctions made by the Maya potters of Yucatan in classifying the physical properties of clay types and finds that folk distinctions match the mineral composition of the materials. Although he does not focus on how potters actually find mineral reserves, he pays attention to the criteria they use in making distinctions among clays of different qualities. Several mechanisms suggest themselves for sharing or shifting ex ploration risks (Figure 1). Under scenario 1, the firm/miner receives a fixed fee or wage for exploration irrespective of the outcome and thus bears none of the geological risks. This contract structure does not contain built-in incentives to encourage exploration.Under scenario 3, the firm/miner bears all the exploration risks. If they are averse to risk, they may underexplore, as each party waits to see the outcome of a neighbor'S discover...