2020
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2020.1826375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peat smoke inhalation alters blood pressure, baroreflex sensitivity, and cardiac arrhythmia risk in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the first time in a human study, we demonstrated an improvement in BRS associated with short-term reductions in indoor PM 2.5 concentrations. Although the mechanism of the activation of pulmonary receptors via PM 2.5 results in autonomic nervous system imbalance, leading to CVD events, which has been explained as one of the major pathways [ 2 , 4 , 18 ], the association between PM 2.5 and baroreflex sensitivity was very limited in two animal experiments with conflicting results [ 26 , 27 ]. As decreased BRS in MI patients significantly increased the malignancy of the event, including lethal arrhythmias and mortality in a large prospective registry [ 28 ], our findings in this study highlight the clinical importance of managing PM 2.5 in CAD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time in a human study, we demonstrated an improvement in BRS associated with short-term reductions in indoor PM 2.5 concentrations. Although the mechanism of the activation of pulmonary receptors via PM 2.5 results in autonomic nervous system imbalance, leading to CVD events, which has been explained as one of the major pathways [ 2 , 4 , 18 ], the association between PM 2.5 and baroreflex sensitivity was very limited in two animal experiments with conflicting results [ 26 , 27 ]. As decreased BRS in MI patients significantly increased the malignancy of the event, including lethal arrhythmias and mortality in a large prospective registry [ 28 ], our findings in this study highlight the clinical importance of managing PM 2.5 in CAD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To establish the baseline response, the authors first delivered smoldering peat smoke to adult male Wistar-Kyoto rats at 0.4 mg/m 3 (low) and 4 mg/m 3 (high) PM concentrations. 117 Note that the low PM target matches ambient particulate levels measured amid peat fires in North Carolina, 24 while the high PM approximates the upper-bound respirable particulate concentrations encountered by WLFFs during active duty. 72 Although both exposure levels raised diastolic and systolic BP, low peat alone dysregulated baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS), enhanced aconitine-induced arrhythmogenesis, and increased circulating LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, with positive trends toward higher concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme and white blood cells.…”
Section: Compendium On Environmental Impacts On Cardiovascular Health...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…72 Although both exposure levels raised diastolic and systolic BP, low peat alone dysregulated baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS), enhanced aconitine-induced arrhythmogenesis, and increased circulating LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, with positive trends toward higher concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme and white blood cells. 117 These functional shifts reflect imbalances in homeostatic mechanisms and systemic outcomes that may exacerbate the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in vulnerable populations with preexisting conditions or under stress. Following this lead, the authors implemented the same exposure protocol to elucidate the effect of smoldering peat smoke inhalation on the postprandial response to a high-fat challenge.…”
Section: Compendium On Environmental Impacts On Cardiovascular Health...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rodent models have long been the canonical experimental model system for the investigation of adverse health impacts of respirable pollutants including biomass combustion emissions (Martin et al, 2020). However, rodent inhalation exposure studies are limited by the time and expense needed to acquire and process toxicity information.…”
Section: Table Of Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%