2020
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abae2a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peatland protection and restoration are key for climate change mitigation

Abstract: Peatlands cover only about 3% the global land area, but store about twice as much carbon as global forest biomass. If intact peatlands are drained for agriculture or other human uses, peat oxidation can result in considerable CO2 emissions and other greenhouse gases (GHG) for decades or even centuries. Despite their importance, emissions from degraded peatlands have so far not been included explicitly in mitigation pathways compatible with the Paris Agreement. Such pathways include land-demanding mitigation op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
97
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, while deep pristine peatlands will likely be resistant and resilient to drought, shallow peatlands such as younger and/or slow‐accumulating peatlands (Vardy et al, 2000), recently restored peatlands (Granath et al, 2016), and organic soils under moss and lichen mats on the upland rock barrens (Hudson et al, 2020; Moore et al, 2019) will be more vulnerable and conservation and potential adaptive management efforts may be necessary to maintain the carbon storage function of these sites. Given that peatland restoration has been emphasized as an important nature‐based solution to mitigate climate change (Humpenöder et al, 2020), our research also highlights the vulnerability of peatland restoration efforts in situations where the peat and moss layer are shallow (Grand‐Clement et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For example, while deep pristine peatlands will likely be resistant and resilient to drought, shallow peatlands such as younger and/or slow‐accumulating peatlands (Vardy et al, 2000), recently restored peatlands (Granath et al, 2016), and organic soils under moss and lichen mats on the upland rock barrens (Hudson et al, 2020; Moore et al, 2019) will be more vulnerable and conservation and potential adaptive management efforts may be necessary to maintain the carbon storage function of these sites. Given that peatland restoration has been emphasized as an important nature‐based solution to mitigate climate change (Humpenöder et al, 2020), our research also highlights the vulnerability of peatland restoration efforts in situations where the peat and moss layer are shallow (Grand‐Clement et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Degradation following past land-use conversion will continue to release large amounts of carbon over decades to come (Leifeld and Menichetti, 2018). Given prompt action, this committed and additional carbon loss could be partly mitigated with largescale restoration and re-wetting efforts (Warren et al, 2017;Nugent et al, 2019;Günther et al, 2020) in conjunction with strong protection policies (Humpenöder et al, 2020;Wibisana and Setyorini, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO 2 flux time series was also used to infer the start and end of the carbon uptake period (CUP) as a proxy to derive drought effects on plant phenology. In addition, we deployed a simple GEP light-use efficiency model (Hunt, 1994;Gower et al, 1999) to further elucidate the biophysical mechanisms that control photosynthetic CO 2 uptake during periods of drought. This interdisciplinary long-term approach, including ecosystem-scale monitoring of vegetation development and greenhouse gas exchange, allowed us to track the response mechanisms of a rewetted fen to a severe drought event and thereby to infer insights into the resilience of this novel ecosystem in times of more frequently upcoming climate extremes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%