2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peculiar glitch of PSR J1119−6127 and extension of the vortex creep model

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These vortex numbers are of the same order as inferred for other glitches of the Crab (Alpar et al 1996;Akbal & Alpar 2018) and Vela pulsars (Akbal et al 2017) as well as in PSR J1119−6127 (Akbal et al 2015). Statistical studies show that the associated ratio δΩ s /Ω s also seems to lie in a common range in all pulsars irrespective of age (Alpar & Baykal 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These vortex numbers are of the same order as inferred for other glitches of the Crab (Alpar et al 1996;Akbal & Alpar 2018) and Vela pulsars (Akbal et al 2017) as well as in PSR J1119−6127 (Akbal et al 2015). Statistical studies show that the associated ratio δΩ s /Ω s also seems to lie in a common range in all pulsars irrespective of age (Alpar & Baykal 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The broken plate size D in a crustquake can be determined from simple geometrical arguments (Akbal et al 2015):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the first time that a glitch, or the post-glitch recovery process, has been observed to influence the radio emission process of a normal (non-RRAT) pulsar. A starquake model with crustal plate movement has been proposed to explain the changing emission properties coincident with the glitch (Akbal et al 2015), as well as the unusual glitch recovery (see Antonopoulou et al 2015).…”
Section: Single Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximately constant second derivativeΩ c interglitch timing behaviour observed in the Vela and other pulsars (Akbal et al 2017;Yu et al 2013) corresponds to a uniform density of vortices unpinned at the glitch leading to a range of waiting times throughout the superfluid regions. Two component models with linear or nonlinear internal torques have so far been applied to post-glitch or inter-glitch timing behaviour of radio pulsars (Alpar et al 1993(Alpar et al , 1996Akbal et al 2015Akbal et al , 2017Gügercinoglu 2017), where the external torque, with a secular (characteristic) timescale τ c ≡ Ω c /2|Ω c | ∼ 10 3 − 10 6 yr is constant for timescales of observed postglitch relaxation.…”
Section: Two-component Models With Constant External Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no evidence that the external torque is changing in pulsar glitches (this may not be the case for the exceptional glitch of PSR J 1119−6127 where the pulsar signature changes at the glitch possibly indicating a change in the external torque (Akbal et al 2015;Archibald et al 2016)). Hence the observed glitch associated offsets ∆Ω c in the crust spindown rate and the subsequent relaxation give a measure of the ratio of moments of inertia of the crust and the superfluid components involved:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%