Peculiarities of the epilepsy immunopathogenesis

Madjidova, Y.; Azizova, R.; Rakhimbaeva, G.

doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.07.034

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This paper strives to demonstrate the merits of the model as well as the challenges that the modern society of Oman is facing in its attempt to resolve ongoing interpersonal and intra‐group conflicts. Moreover, with this study, we illustrate how to integrate indigenous conflict management strategies with government judicial systems thereby adding to the limited literature on the mechanisms of organizing and institutionalizing indigenous conflict resolution models to resolve interpersonal and intra‐group conflicts (Avruch, 2015; Azizova et al, 2016; Lundy et al, 2022; Lundy & Njonguo, 2019; Mengstie, 2022; Millar, 2014). The Omani model takes into consideration the expectations and calls from the past (ancestral heritage, traditional cultural and Islamic values, Sharia Law, social conduct) and the present (the state apparatus, modern governance, the civil legislative system), bridging government efforts with the voice of the community in the country's ongoing attempts to re‐shuffle and balance power among all the players across the systems in response to internal and external changes and challenges.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

This is how they do it: A conflict management model in Oman

Dauletova,

Al Rawas,

Al Rawas

et al. 2024

Conflict Resolution Qtrly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oman and its conflict management model are the focus of this paper. This model has crystalized out of the three stand‐alone but complementary systems of conflict resolution which evolved in an ad hoc fashion: the institute of tribal leaders; the reconciliation committees; and the formal judicial system. These systems offer a foundation for the current efforts of the local people to sustain a peaceful co‐existence among the vibrant and ethnically diverse Omani communities known for their turbulent past. The analyzed data obtained from interviews with Omani tribal leaders, reconciliation committee members, and lawyers shed light on both the strengths of the conflict management model and the modern challenges which the model faces. The findings confirm that this model represents a coherent entity run by an integrated constitutional‐tribal order. They also suggest that the model serves as a state mechanism for balancing power between the country's major players—the government and the institute of tribal leaders. The novel contribution of this paper lies in linking the origin and philosophy of each system with the “mediation identity” of Oman's foreign policy.

show abstract