2019
DOI: 10.15407/frg2019.06.463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peculiarities of the mechanisms of spontaneous, and induced by ionizing radiation and chemical factors mutagenesis

Abstract: mutagenic factors which will cause a high level of organism variability directed by a plant-breeder, and will help identify the ways how to avoid their negative genetic consequences in case of they ingress into environment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-lasting action of high doses of radiation is believed to induce a number of nonvital mutants that were not taken into account in the overall frequency of mutations (Mousseau & Møller, 2020). Non-linear pattern of induction of mutations in the organisms that are subject to chronic exposure in the territories with different levels of specific activity of radionuclides was found in many tested plants: narrowleaf hawksbeard Crepis tectorum, Scots pine Pinus sylvestris, pea Pisum sativum, winter rye, winter wheat, barley (Zaichkina et al, 2004;Geras'kin et al, 2008;Boratyński et al, 2016;Olsen & Dineva, 2017;Morgun et al, 2019;Hase et al, 2020;Shuryak & Brenner, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-lasting action of high doses of radiation is believed to induce a number of nonvital mutants that were not taken into account in the overall frequency of mutations (Mousseau & Møller, 2020). Non-linear pattern of induction of mutations in the organisms that are subject to chronic exposure in the territories with different levels of specific activity of radionuclides was found in many tested plants: narrowleaf hawksbeard Crepis tectorum, Scots pine Pinus sylvestris, pea Pisum sativum, winter rye, winter wheat, barley (Zaichkina et al, 2004;Geras'kin et al, 2008;Boratyński et al, 2016;Olsen & Dineva, 2017;Morgun et al, 2019;Hase et al, 2020;Shuryak & Brenner, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Головною мішенню впливу генотоксичних хімічних сполук у клітині є ДНК та, ймовірно, деякі білки, які відіграють структурну роль в організації геному або беруть участь у реплікації, рекомбінації чи репарації пошкоджень ДНК [2]. Дослідивши близько 200 сполук різної природи, І. А. Рапопорт встановив, що за механізмами впливу на живі організми вони відрізняються (інактиватори і активатори ферментів, зв'язувачі білків, аналоги фізіологічно активних сполук і продукти катаболізму) [3], але в основі їх дії лежить одне джерело -величини дипольних моментів [4].…”
unclassified