Pedagogical Bricoleurs and Bricolage Researchers: The case of Religious Education

Abstract

This article reconceptualises school teachers and pupils respectively as 'pedagogical bricoleurs' and 'bricolage researchers' who utilise a multiplicity of theories, concepts, methodologies and pedagogies in teaching and/or researching. This reconceptualization is based on a coalescence of generic curricular and pedagogical principles promoting dialogic, critical and enquiry-based learning. Innovative proposals for reconceptualising the aims, contents and methods of multi-faith Religious Education in English statemaintained schools without a religious affiliation are described, so as to provide an instance of and occasion for the implications of these theories and concepts of learning. With the aim of initiating pupils into the communities of academic enquiry concerned with theology and religious studies, the 'RE-searchers approach' to multi-faith Religious Education in primary schools (5-11 year olds) is cited as a highly innovative means of converting these curricular and pedagogical principles and proposals into practical classroom procedures that are characterised by multi-, inter-and supra-disciplinarity; notions of eclecticism, emergence, flexibility and plurality; and theoretical and conceptual complexity, contestation and context-dependence.

Decoding the Digital Gap in Teacher Education: Three Perspectives across the Globe

“…A recent study from Uganda [40] found that regardless of the resourceconstrained context and pedagogical challenges experienced by academics, their attitude demonstrated resilience, flexibility and determination to embrace ICT in their teaching practice. This study challenges the notion of academics being passive, 'making do' with what is at hand [41] and claims that academics are resourceful practitioners, seeking inventive ways to teach more effectively.…”

Religion and Education: Framing and Mapping a Field

“…However, methodologically and pedagogically the subject has in this context become plural, the multiple and sometimes conflicting aims for the subject resulting in a number of different approaches to teaching of it (see Grimmitt, 2000). Recent pedagogies and approaches have sought to rationalize and legitimize this plurality in terms of preparing children and young people to study Theology and Religious Studies at university level, inculcating them into the approaches and methodologies utilized in higher education (Freathy et al, 2017).…”

What does “new learning” require from religious education teachers? A study of Finnish RE teachers’ perceptions

“…RE needs to deal with ongoing global trends such as the reality of religious plurality (Berger 2014;Riegel and Delling 2014), individualization of religions (Jackson 2014;Woodhead and Catto 2012), and the consequences of secularization (Taylor 2007). The wide ongoing debate about developing RE in many Western countries has focused on what kind of knowledge RE should provide and what skills and competencies are most relevant today (Freathy et al 2017;Skeie 2014;Conroy 2016;CoRe 2018;Clarke and Woodhead 2017). In addition, RE has been faced with new conceptions of learning pedagogy, namely "new learning".…”