Pedagogical conditions that promote historical empathy with “The Elizabeth Jennings Project”

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine whether or not the implementation of an instructional unit about an underrepresented historical figure, specifically Elizabeth Jennings, titled “The Elizabeth Jennings Project” (EJP) creates conditions conducive for middle and secondary social studies students to demonstrate historical empathy. Design/methodology/approach A case study methodology was selected for this study because the researcher implemented the EJP at one school with a small sample size of participants to assess which pedagogical factors, if any, fostered historical empathy through analysis of an underrepresented historical figure among middle and secondary social studies students. Findings Major findings highlight that active learning pedagogies, such as in-class debate, were effective strategies that promote historical empathy when middle and secondary students examined documents about an underrepresented historical figure. Analysis of the implementation of “The EJP” provides insights about how historical empathy pedagogies can connect to national standards and initiatives such as the Common Core Standards for History/Social Studies and the National Council for the Social Studies College, Career, and Civic Life Framework for middle and secondary social studies. Originality/value Historical empathy refers to deep inquiry in which intellectual and affective responses to content are shaped through source analysis of the actions, motives, perspectives and beliefs of people in the past. Although there are several studies that address pedagogies that promote historical empathy through examinations of famous historical figures, there is limited research concerning whether students display historical empathy by investigating underrepresented historical figures such as Elizabeth Jennings.

Film as a gateway to teaching about slavery through historical empathy: a case study using 12 Years a Slave (McQueen, 2013)

“…In particular, we know relatively little about how students' emotional reactions influence their learning of history and their capacity to use perspective recognition (Endacott and Brooks, 2018). While multiple studies have addressed how students could positively develop historical empathy through the use of written historical sources that are related to significant historical figures, such as Harry Truman (Yeager and Doppen, 2001) or Neville Chamberlain (Foster, 1999), fewer studies have investigated the stimulation of historical empathy and understanding through under-represented historical actors (Perrotta, 2018) and through other sources, such as film. For example, Rantala et al (2016)…”

“The Perception of Visiting Holocaust Sites on Undergraduate Students Learning Process”

“…To foster historical contextualisation, perspective taking and affective connections consistent with the concept, it has been argued that reflective teaching and practice is essential, and that lecturers need to assist students in making these cognitive and affective connections (Perrotta, 2018;Utami, 2019). Under such circumstances it has been argued that historical empathy can help students understand varied perspectives and tolerance of others via active learning processes and student engagement with historical events (see Barton & Levstik, 2004;Brooks, 2008;Endacott, 2010;Grant, 2001).…”

Experiencing historical empathy's humanizing lenses: adolescents' interpretative flights

“…Colby (2010) observed students' abilities to challenge historical truths when presented with conflicting sources. Others (De Leur et al, 2017;Rantala et al, 2016;Yeager and Doppen, 2001) explored the importance of exposing students to multiple points of view and underrepresented historical figures (Perrotta, 2018). Scholars explored teachers' perceptions of historical empathy, which included use of discourse strategies (Cunningham, 2009) and primary documents as social products (Ohn, 2010), yet also found limitations in teachers' ascertainments of effective pedagogy (Endacott and Sturtz, 2015).…”