2002
DOI: 10.1080/03057640220116409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedagogical Dilemmas in the National Literacy Strategy: Primary teachers' perceptions, reflections and classroom behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
39
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Lipman et al (1980) claim that 'Unless teachers are trained by means of the identical instructional approaches as those that they will be expected to utilise in their own classrooms, their preparation will be a failure' (p. 47). The evidence strongly supports the value of a democratic (participatory, inclusive), collaborative approach to training and development, which promotes (group) discussion, critical reflection, self-evaluation and decision-making (see, for example, Lewin, 1952Lewin, , 1982Revans, 1985;Carr & Kemmis, 1983;Hardman & Mroz, 1999;English et al, 2002).…”
Section: Requirement 2 Training Which Mirrors Interactive Teachingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Lipman et al (1980) claim that 'Unless teachers are trained by means of the identical instructional approaches as those that they will be expected to utilise in their own classrooms, their preparation will be a failure' (p. 47). The evidence strongly supports the value of a democratic (participatory, inclusive), collaborative approach to training and development, which promotes (group) discussion, critical reflection, self-evaluation and decision-making (see, for example, Lewin, 1952Lewin, , 1982Revans, 1985;Carr & Kemmis, 1983;Hardman & Mroz, 1999;English et al, 2002).…”
Section: Requirement 2 Training Which Mirrors Interactive Teachingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Of particular relevance to this paper, is the endorsement of interactive whole class teaching which was promoted in the NNS and NLS (DfEE, 1998(DfEE, , 1999 as a collective pedagogy aimed at offering ''high levels of involvement for all pupils, particularly the least able, many of whom quickly gain confidence'' (DfEE, 1998, p. 10). This had limited impact on classroom practices (English et al, 2002;Mroz et al, 2000;Smith, Hardman, Wall, & Mroz, 2004) and consequently, was omitted from the recent National Primary Strategy in favour of a more personalised learning approach (Alexander, 2004). I have argued elsewhere (Black, 2007) that policy on interactive whole class teaching may have been ineffective because it presented teachers with contradictory discourses-a discourse of social inclusion which conflicted with the dominant discourse of performativity and accountability inherent in England's education system (Alexander, 2004).…”
Section: The Individualised Learnermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A number of studies have highlighted how both concepts are commonplace in many teachers' descriptions of their own practice. In respect of 'time pressure', both English, Hargreaves, and Hislam (2002) and Mroz, Smith, and Hardman (2000) report how teachers felt a daily conflict between adherence to the pace of the curriculum and the need to foster extended pupil contributions in whole class teaching contexts. Such an account of conflict strongly resonates with the comments made by Mrs. Williams' referred to earlier.…”
Section: The Individualised Learnermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interactive teaching on the other hand often supports social constructivist or socio-cultural learning. This includes being open for creative thinking, using challenging and open ended questions, encouraging group discussions and initiating more interaction, both between students and between teachers and students (English, Hargreaves and Hislam, 2002).…”
Section: Learning Theories and Factors That Influence Teacher Intervementioning
confidence: 99%