2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c04843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedagogical Overview of the Fewest Switches Surface Hopping Method

Abstract: The fewest switches surface hopping method continues to grow in popularity to capture electronic nonadiabaticity and quantum nuclear effects due to its simplicity and accuracy. Knowing the basics of the method is essential for the correct implementation and interpretation of results. This review covers the fundamentals of the fewest switches surface hopping method with a detailed discussion of the nuances such as decoherence schemes and frustrated hops and the correct approach to calculating populations. The c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most efficient methods for simulating electronically nonadiabatic processes are semiclassical methods, in which the electronic structure is modeled quantum mechanically, and nuclear motion follows a semiclassical trajectory. , We consider calculations in the adiabatic representation where the coupling of electronic states is due to the nonadiabatic coupling vector (NAC). We focus first on the coherent propagation of electronic coefficients, but decoherence will be added below.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most efficient methods for simulating electronically nonadiabatic processes are semiclassical methods, in which the electronic structure is modeled quantum mechanically, and nuclear motion follows a semiclassical trajectory. , We consider calculations in the adiabatic representation where the coupling of electronic states is due to the nonadiabatic coupling vector (NAC). We focus first on the coherent propagation of electronic coefficients, but decoherence will be added below.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, many approximations are adopted such as averaging out environment degrees of freedom 18 and classical description of the system and/or environment. 19,20 In the past three decades, great progress has been made in the development of theoretical approaches for open quantum systems. These approaches include the perturbative Redfield equation, 21 the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig formalism 22,23 and its kernel-based expansions, [24][25][26] the quantum-classical and fully classical approaches, 20,[27][28][29][30] Green's function formalism, 31 the transfer tensor method 32 and its extension, 33 the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH), 34,35 the pseudo-mode approach, 36,37 the reaction coordinate (RC) approach, 38,39 the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), 40,41 the time-dependent numerical renormalization group (NRG), 42 the density matrix renormalization group (tDMRG), 43 the polaron transformation, 24,44 the time evolving density matrix using the orthogonal polynomial algorithm (TEDOPA), 45,46 the quasiadiabatic propagator path integral (QuAPI), 47,48 the numerical variational method (NVM), 49 the automated compression of environment (ACE) method, 50 the hierarchy equations of motion (HEOM), [51][52][53][54]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, many approximations are adopted such as averaging out environment degrees of freedom 18 and classical description of the system and/or environment. 19,20 In the past three decades, great progress has been made in the development of theoretical approaches for open quantum systems. These approaches include the perturbative Redfield equation, 21 the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig formalism 22,23 and its kernel-based expansions, [24][25][26] the quantum-classical and fully classical approaches, 20,[27][28][29][30] Green's function formalism, 31 the transfer tensor method 32 and its extension, 33 the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH), 34,35 the pseudo-mode approach, 36,37 the reaction coordinate (RC) approach, 38,39 the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), 40,41 the time-dependent numerical renormalization group (NRG), 42 the density matrix renormalization group (tDMRG), 43 the polaron transformation, 24,44 the time evolving density matrix using the orthogonal polynomial algorithm (TEDOPA), 45,46 the quasiadiabatic propagator path integral (QuAPI), 47,48 the numerical variational method (NVM), 49 the automated compression of environment (ACE) method, 50 the hierarchy equations of motion (HEOM), [51][52][53][54]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%