2017
DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2017.1360373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedagogy from and for Social Movements: A Conversation Between Theory and Practice

Abstract: Much radical writing on academia is grounded in a mystified view of knowledge in which an ecosocialist pedagogy would be "theory from above." This article argues for a different understanding of knowledge as materially situated in social and ecological relationships; oriented towards practice; developmental and contested from below, demystifying third-level education from the perspective of movement-generated knowledge. Concretely, this means starting from participants' existing praxis and "learning from each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our sampling approach lead us to a set of participants highly engaged with the MAOG, but unrepresentative of the views of local community members either in Algarve or Leiria. Additionally, by focusing our analysis solely on the views of a reduced number of participants who were highly involved, we did not examine if and how such bridges may have constrained the involvement of ordinary citizens (Cox, 2019). Future studies should look into the dynamics of interaction between different players, for example between grassroots groups and political parties, through ethnographic approaches, and from the perspective of community members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our sampling approach lead us to a set of participants highly engaged with the MAOG, but unrepresentative of the views of local community members either in Algarve or Leiria. Additionally, by focusing our analysis solely on the views of a reduced number of participants who were highly involved, we did not examine if and how such bridges may have constrained the involvement of ordinary citizens (Cox, 2019). Future studies should look into the dynamics of interaction between different players, for example between grassroots groups and political parties, through ethnographic approaches, and from the perspective of community members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, particularly in the climate and environmental movement, it is quite common to have alliances between grassroots groups (local and informal organizations) and NGOs (formally organized under non-profit charters), although these players trend to distrust each other (De Moor, 2018). Simultaneously, the existence of top-down platforms of compound players may also restrain the participation of individual and ordinary players (Cox, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Laurence Cox (2019) emphasizes the need to decenter the academy as the primary site of knowledge production and instead center 'theory from below'. As Cox (2019) states: 'Why would it make sense to begin with advanced university students when trying to change the world?' (p. 71).…”
Section: Toward a Counter-public Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an emphasis on activism echoes counter-public sociology claims that the university cannot be the primary catalyst for radical social movements or transformation. Similarly, Laurence Cox (2019) emphasizes the need to decenter the academy as the primary site of knowledge production and instead center ‘theory from below’. As Cox (2019) states: ‘Why would it make sense to begin with advanced university students when trying to change the world?’ (p. 71).…”
Section: Toward a Counter-public Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8-9). Fortunately, there is a growing literature within social movement scholarship focusing on social movements as knowledge and theory creators in their own right, and this chapter aims to add to this growing literature (Casas-Cortés et al, 2008;Choudry, 2009;Choudry & Kapoor, 2010;Cox, 2019;Cox & Fominaya, 2009;Daro, 2009;Della Porta & Pavan, 2017;Hall, 2009;Arribas Lozano, 2018;Lysack, 2009;Niesz, 2019;Niesz et al, 2018;Teasley & Butler, 2020). However, literature on social movements and knowledge creation has existed even longer within the literature on adult, or popular, education and, both directly and indirectly, in the literature on decolonial critiques of westernized 1 epistemologies (Foley, 1999;Hall, 2009;Niesz et al, 2018;Santos, 2016;Teasley & Butler, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%