2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2014.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric first time non-febrile seizure with focal manifestations: Is emergent imaging indicated?

Abstract: Four percent of children imaged with first time, afebrile focal seizures have findings important to initial management. Children younger than ≤ 18 months are at increased risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other investigations have variably found prolonged seizure duration as a potential predictor of intracranial abnormalities. 5,17,18 In addition, we found no association between the presence of clinically relevant intracranial abnormalities and young age. Our results regarding age are similar to those of the largest similar previous study but conflict with previous (retrospective) studies that suggested that age ,6 months was an important predictor.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other investigations have variably found prolonged seizure duration as a potential predictor of intracranial abnormalities. 5,17,18 In addition, we found no association between the presence of clinically relevant intracranial abnormalities and young age. Our results regarding age are similar to those of the largest similar previous study but conflict with previous (retrospective) studies that suggested that age ,6 months was an important predictor.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…5,16,20 One recent study reported that younger age may help identify children with focal seizures at higher risk of emergent abnormalities. 18 The clinical risk factors that were independently associated with intracranial abnormalities have been previously shown to have moderateto-substantial interobserver agreement among pediatric emergency medicine physicians (eg, any seizure focality: k = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.71; any focal neurologic findings on examination: k = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.3-1.0). 22 However, clinical findings are likely to be interpreted differently among physicians with different areas of expertise (eg neurologists, and ED physicians) and different levels of training (eg, faculty versus residents), as well as among clinicians with similar training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, 13 (4.1%) of the 319 children who underwent imaging for a first episode of nonfebrile seizure with focal manifestations were found, in a previous study, to have clinically urgent intracranial pathology resulting in a change of initial patient management. 21 In another report on 319 patients who were admitted to the emergency department with a first attack of seizure, 61 underwent neuroimaging studies and 16 patients were found to have abnormal imaging findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] CT identifies imaging abnormalities in 7-24% of children but alters immediate medical management in only a minority. 4,6,7 The American Academy of Neurology states that there is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation at the level of standard or guideline for the use of routine neuroimaging in children with a first afebrile seizure. 8 Therefore, emergent neuroimaging is indicated for selected cases according to history and physical examination considering potential risks of radiation, sedation and contrast agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%