1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38198141501.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric peripheral blood progenitor cell collection: haemonetics MCS 3P versus COBE Spectra versus Fresenius AS104

Abstract: All machines seem to have comparable PBPC extraction efficiency, but the AS104 seems to give the component with the greatest PBPC enrichment. This feature might be relevant for further ex vivo cell processing (CD34+ cell selection, expansion, and so on).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there was a thrombocyte loss after PPC collection, median platelet counts were equal before and after apheresis due to the described thrombocyte recirculation and additional homologous platelet transfusion in two children with platelet counts below 30,000/µl prior to apheresis. Our data were confirmed by Bambi et al [13] who found that postapheresis platelet counts dropped, at least in pediatric PPC collections with the Fresenius machine in comparison with the Haemonetics MCS 3p and COBE Spectra devices. Hematological recovery after autologous PPC transplantation was achieved in our 6 transplanted patients, and the median days of WBC recovery were similar to those reported by other authors [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although there was a thrombocyte loss after PPC collection, median platelet counts were equal before and after apheresis due to the described thrombocyte recirculation and additional homologous platelet transfusion in two children with platelet counts below 30,000/µl prior to apheresis. Our data were confirmed by Bambi et al [13] who found that postapheresis platelet counts dropped, at least in pediatric PPC collections with the Fresenius machine in comparison with the Haemonetics MCS 3p and COBE Spectra devices. Hematological recovery after autologous PPC transplantation was achieved in our 6 transplanted patients, and the median days of WBC recovery were similar to those reported by other authors [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The collection of PBSC can be performed on various cell separator devices operating with semiautomated or automated apheresis programs [9, 10, 11]. The aim of the present study was to evaluate collection yields of conventional-volume COBE Spectra AutoPBSC leukaphereses and to demonstrate clinical significance of collected PBSC following HDCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reports described CD34-CE between 48 and 87% at preapheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts of approximately 30/µl, using the cell separators Fresenius AS104, Haemonetics MCS-3P, COBE Spectra (protocol 4.7) and/or Fenwal CS3000 [9, 10, 11, 19, 20, 21]. Some authors reported better CD34-CE at a preapheresis level of circulating CD34+ cells <50/µl [13, 22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic of final product volumes using different cell separator systems has been discussed controversially in previous studies [5,9,11,16]. An apheresis procedure resulting in a small product volume facilitates the subsequent processing of the product [1,4,5,7,8,17]. In this respect, the Fresenius system proves to be preferable to the COBE Spectra system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the recent years, different clinical regimens for transplantation have been developed, taking advantage of improved approaches to collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) [1][2][3]. PBSC are used for autologous transplantation, and with increasing tendency also for allogeneic transplantation [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Different types of cell separators have been introduced for obtaining PBSC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%