2014
DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x14000909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric Triage and Allocation of Critical Care Resources During Disaster: Northwest Provider Opinion

Abstract: One hundred and twelve (97%) of 116 total attendees responded to at least one question; however, four of these responders failed to answer every question. Sixty-two (55%) responders were nurses, 29 (26%) physicians, and 21 (19%) other occupations. Fifty-five (51%) responders worked in pediatric hospitals vs 53 (49%) in other locations. Sixty-three (58%) of 108 successful responses prioritized children predicted to have a good neuro-cognitive outcome. Seventy-one (68%) agreed that no pediatric age group should … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, because the original START system has been well-accepted as a tool for pediatric and adult evacuees, the green category may be immediately perceived as "low-risk evacuees." 17 This is especially important because multiple professionals with both medical and nonmedical backgrounds need to share patients' information before a NICU evacuation plan is developed. 5,18 Finally, START-Neo-R has the possible negative effect of automatically determining categories based on a few keywords.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, because the original START system has been well-accepted as a tool for pediatric and adult evacuees, the green category may be immediately perceived as "low-risk evacuees." 17 This is especially important because multiple professionals with both medical and nonmedical backgrounds need to share patients' information before a NICU evacuation plan is developed. 5,18 Finally, START-Neo-R has the possible negative effect of automatically determining categories based on a few keywords.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is thus a need for an ethically sound, widely accepted, and well-validated approach for allocation of scarce resources for children during a disaster (1,4,6). Although pediatric providers are divided on the use of protocols for triage decisions (7), both the PEMCC Task Force and CHEST guidelines recommend that objective protocols rather than ad hoc clinical judgment be used to determine allocation of limited resources during crises (1,8). Several pediatric illness severity scores have been evaluated for ventilator-triage protocols; however, only the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) score (9) fulfills all criteria deemed important for use in a triage algorithm (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%