PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications

Rahmitasari, Fitria; Ishida, Yuichi; Kurahashi, Kosuke; Matsuda, Takashi; Watanabe, Megumi; Ichikawa, Tetsuo

doi:10.3390/dj5040035

Cited by 148 publications

(127 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

116

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 2 shows the elastic modulus of these composites along with commercially used dental alloy for an implant. [7]…”

Section: Peek Reinforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Polyetheretherketone in prosthodontics – A review

Pai¹,

Kumari²,

Umamaheswari³

et al. 2019

jcri

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Materials used in different fields of prosthodontics have evolved over the years. In recent years, patient more preferably demands a metal-free, lightweight, tooth-colored prosthesis. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) can be used in various ways in prosthodontics. The aim of this article is to encapsulate the precedence of PEEK, compared to other restorative materials that have been used currently, based on various studies conducted on this material.

show abstract

“…Table 2 shows the elastic modulus of these composites along with commercially used dental alloy for an implant. [7]…”

Section: Peek Reinforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 3 shows different surface modifications of PEEK. [7] PEEK in fixed prostheses PEEK can be used to make the framework of fixed denture prostheses. It can also be used for the dental crown preparation with a facial coating of veneering composites.…”

Section: Surface Modification Of Peek For Osseointegrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Polyetheretherketone in prosthodontics – A review

Pai¹,

Kumari²,

Umamaheswari³

et al. 2019

jcri

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, these materials have disadvantages such as the inducible metal allergy and discoloration of the marginal mucosa [34]. In this respect, functional implant fixtures composed of bioinert and biocompatible materials such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and zirconia have been widely studied as a possible alternative to titanium implant fixtures [35]. In addition, functional integral designs such as one-piece zirconia implant have been introduced, which can be mounted directly on the alveolar bone [36].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Composite Scaffold for Simultaneous Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Installation

Jeong

Gwak

Seo

et al. 2020

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implant surgeries involve the insertion of implant fixtures into alveolar bones to replace missing teeth. When the availability of alveolar bone at the surgical site is insufficient, bone graft particles are filled in the insertion site for successful bone reconstruction. Bone graft particles induce bone regeneration over several months at the insertion site. Subsequently, implant fixtures can be inserted at the recipient site. Thus, conventional dental implant surgery is performed in several steps, which in turn increases the treatment period and cost involved. Therefore, to reduce surgical time and minimize treatment costs, a novel hybrid scaffold filled with bone graft particles that could be combined with implant fixtures is proposed. This scaffold is composed of a three-dimensionally (3D) printed polycaprolactone (PCL) frame and osteoconductive ceramic materials such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). Herein, we analyzed the porosity, internal microstructure, and hydrophilicity of the hybrid scaffold. Additionally, Saos-2 cells were used to assess cell viability and proliferation. Two types of control scaffolds were used (a 3D printed PCL frame and a hybrid scaffold without HA/β-TCP particles) for comparison, and the fabricated hybrid scaffold was verified to retain osteoconductive ceramic particles without losses. Moreover, the fabricated hybrid scaffold had high porosity and excellent microstructural interconnectivity. The in vitro Saos-2 cell experiments revealed superior cell proliferation and alkaline phosphatase assay results for the hybrid scaffold than the control scaffold. Hence, the proposed hybrid scaffold is a promising candidate for minimizing cost and duration of dental implant surgery.

show abstract

“…Various modifications had been done to enhance the surface characteristics of PEEK materials and to make it more biocompatible. In an attempt to achieve early osseointegration of implant, nanoparticles in form of Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), HAp, and HAF were combined with PEEK to produce bioactive nanocomposites, and chemical modifications were also done to get the surface roughness of the PEEK material …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review

Mishra¹,

Chowdhary

2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

153

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Evaluation of the available research on PEEK materials to find that whether PEEK material has favorable properties and can enhance osseointegration, so that they can be utilize as implants material. Materials and Methods An electronic and structured systematic search was undertaken in May 2018, without any restrictions of time in the Medline/Pubmed, Sci‐hub, Ebscohost, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. To identify other related references further hand search was done. Articles related to PEEK and their applications in implants were only included. Articles not available in abstract form and article other than English language were excluded. Results Initially, the search resulted in 153 papers. Independent screenings of the abstracts were done by the reviewers to identify the articles related to the question in focus. Sixty‐two studies were selected out of which 10 were further excluded due to not in English language. Two additional papers were obtained after hand searching, and finally 54 articles were included in the review. Conclusions Surface modification of PEEK seems to enhance the cell adhesion, proliferation, biocompability, and osteogenic properties of PEEK implant materials. PEEK had also influence the biofilm structure and reduces the chances of periimplant inflammations. Further research and more number of controlled clinical trials on PEEK implant is required in near future so that it can replace titanium in future.

show abstract

PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications

Cited by 148 publications

References 68 publications

Polyetheretherketone in prosthodontics – A review

Polyetheretherketone in prosthodontics – A review

Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Composite Scaffold for Simultaneous Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Installation

PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About