2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2005)9:3(214)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peeling Behavior and Spalling Resistance of Bonded Bidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5% compared to those of the unstrengthened beam L1 and beam L5 strengthened by one-layer SWRs, respectively, showing the strong point of SWR strengthening. The reason why strengthening by steel plate, CFRP, or rehabilitation of RC members with stainless steel wire mesh and permeability polymer mortar could not achieve this effect was that bond failure would occur as along as the layers of applied reinforcement reached a certain level (Lorenc and Kubica, 2006;Wu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Yield Loads and Ultimate Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5% compared to those of the unstrengthened beam L1 and beam L5 strengthened by one-layer SWRs, respectively, showing the strong point of SWR strengthening. The reason why strengthening by steel plate, CFRP, or rehabilitation of RC members with stainless steel wire mesh and permeability polymer mortar could not achieve this effect was that bond failure would occur as along as the layers of applied reinforcement reached a certain level (Lorenc and Kubica, 2006;Wu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Yield Loads and Ultimate Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three strengthening techniques of bonded FRP laminate, steel plate and stainless steel wire all suffer from the same defect, which is that the strengthened structures are prone to premature failure of the beams as a result of plate separation. This is turn blocks the functions of reinforced materials and limits the increment of ultimate load (Wu et al, 2005). In addition, it is difficult work for a designer to predict accurately the ultimate capacity of strengthened structures with debonding failure, despite a substantial amount of correlative research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, different strengthening techniques of structure elements using various materials have been thoroughly investigated for flexural strengthening, including section enlargement (Thanoon, Jaafar, Kadir, & Noorzaei, 2005), external bonding steel plates (Jones, Swamy, & Charif, 1988), external bonding fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) (Choi, West, & Soudki, 2008;Ebead, 2011;Kim, Wight, & Green, 2008;Martin & Lamanna, 2008;Teng et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2005) and near-surface mounted (NSM) FRP strips or bars (Hajihashemi, Mostofinejad, & Azhari, 2011), external posttensioning tendons (Lorenc & Kubica, 2006), rehabilitation with steel wire mesh (Kubaisy & Jumaat 2000) have all been used to strengthen and repair of structures. The structural behaviour of cracked reinforced concrete (RC) one-way slab repaired with different techniques was investigated by Thanoon et al (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibre reinforced polymer has a high strength to weight ratio, excellent resistance to chemical corrosion and ease of handling. Test results show that when FRP are used as externally bonded reinforcement, the flexural stiffness has very little improvement, peeling failure is often occurred without warning and the ductility is reduced extremely than unstrengthened flexural members (Choi et al, 2008;Teng et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2005). To avoid premature failure due to debonding and improve the failure ductility, some techniques have been developed, such as the NSM strengthening technique (Hajihashemi et al, 2011) and mechanically fastened anchorage systems (Ebead, 2011;Martin & Lamanna, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [17,18] studied experimentally and analytically the peeling behavior and spalling resistance effect of unidirectional and bi-directional FRP sheets externally bonded to plane concrete surface. Simple expressions among peeling load, interfacial energy and FRP sheet stiffness were obtained, and the theoretical results were validated by comparison with experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%