2010
DOI: 10.1080/08856250903450947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer acceptance and self‐concept of students with disabilities in regular education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
2
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
63
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Students could nominate maximum five friends. Former similar studies (e.g., Pijl & Frostad, 2010;Pijl et al, 2008) have indicated that five friends is a stable option, restricting the freedom of choice for respondents minimally. The number of friends a student nominated (i.e., outdegree) was used as an indicator of his/her number of friends.…”
Section: Number Of Friendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students could nominate maximum five friends. Former similar studies (e.g., Pijl & Frostad, 2010;Pijl et al, 2008) have indicated that five friends is a stable option, restricting the freedom of choice for respondents minimally. The number of friends a student nominated (i.e., outdegree) was used as an indicator of his/her number of friends.…”
Section: Number Of Friendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mere presence of these pupils in general education classrooms does not automatically result in successful social participation. Pupils with SEN are less involved in social interactions with peers, less accepted and more frequently rejected than their typically developing (TD) peers (Avramidis, 2013;Estell et al, 2008;Feldman, Carter, Asmus, & Brock, 2015;Garrote, 2016;Grütter, Meyer, & Glenz, 2015;Huber, 2006;Koster, Pijl, Nakken, & van Houten, 2010;Nepi, Fioravanti, Nannini, & Peru, 2015;Pijl & Frostad, 2010;Rotheram-Fuller, Kasari, Chamberlain, & Locke, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies and investigations have been conducted concerning creating a positive inclusive environment for learners with special needs (Ainscow 2005;Markussen 2004;Pijl & Frostad 2010;Schwab et al 2014). These studies were deemed necessary as it has been found that students with special needs have fewer interactions with peers, have more interaction with the teacher and are less accepted than their peers without special needs (Koster et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%