2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer assessments of normative and individual teacher–student support predict social acceptance and engagement among low-achieving children

Abstract: This study used hierarchical linear modeling to predict first grade students' peer acceptance, classroom engagement, and sense of school belonging from measures of normative classroom teacher-student support and individual teacher-student support. Participants were 509 (54.4% male) ethnically diverse, first grade children attending one of three Texas School districts (1 urban, 2 small city) who scored below their school district median on a measure of literacy administered at the beginning of first grade. Peer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
62
2
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
62
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Girls reported higher GPAs than did boys, although we do not know if greater teacher support is the cause of higher GPAs and self-efficacy beliefs or vice versa. Nevertheless, the trends reported here are consistent with similar findings on efficacy beliefs from across the nation (Goodenow, 1993;Hughes, Zhang, & Hill, 2006;Newman & Schwager, 1993;Patrick, Ryan, & Kaplan, 2007;Wentzel, 1994;.…”
Section: Ruralsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Girls reported higher GPAs than did boys, although we do not know if greater teacher support is the cause of higher GPAs and self-efficacy beliefs or vice versa. Nevertheless, the trends reported here are consistent with similar findings on efficacy beliefs from across the nation (Goodenow, 1993;Hughes, Zhang, & Hill, 2006;Newman & Schwager, 1993;Patrick, Ryan, & Kaplan, 2007;Wentzel, 1994;.…”
Section: Ruralsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Social settings play a crucial role in satisfying these needs, and teachers are important agents in the students' environment. Consistent with this model, several studies have found significant relations between dimensions of teacher behavior and students' academic engagement (Furrer & Skinner, 2003;Green, Rhodes, Heitler Hirsch, Suárez-Orozco, & Camic, 2008;Hughes, Zhang, & Hill, 2006;Reeve et al, 2004;Skinner & Belmont).…”
Section: Teacher Behavior and Engagementmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…O que ainda não está bem compreendido são os processos envolvidos nessa associação. Crianças que entram na escola com menos recursos de letramento e habilidades de trabalho menos desenvolvidas estão em maior risco para dificuldades relacionais com os pares (Hughes & Kwok, 2007;Hughes, Zhang, & Hill, 2006;Ladd, Birch, & Buhset, 1999); essas dificuldades, por sua vez, podem interferir no desempenho posterior (Buhs et al, 2006). Provavelmente, nessas associações operam efeitos transacionais como, por exemplo, um percurso em que o comportamento e o desempenho da criança afetam a percepção do professor, a percepção do professor influencia a qualidade da sua relação com a criança e esta relação, percebida pelos demais alunos, vai influenciá-los na disposição para aceitar, rejeitar ou mesmo vitimizar o colega.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified