2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer effects, motivation, and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…via tactical overload in a small-sided game). To support this aspect of the theoretical proposals, drawing on literature from education settings that has demonstrated the role of peers in enhancing academic achievement and motivation (e.g., Eisenkopf, 2010) we argue this would have challenged higher performers further whilst also maintaining their presence as a learning resource from which lower performers could develop. We contend that enhancing this capacity to learn may facilitate dual careers in soccer and education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…via tactical overload in a small-sided game). To support this aspect of the theoretical proposals, drawing on literature from education settings that has demonstrated the role of peers in enhancing academic achievement and motivation (e.g., Eisenkopf, 2010) we argue this would have challenged higher performers further whilst also maintaining their presence as a learning resource from which lower performers could develop. We contend that enhancing this capacity to learn may facilitate dual careers in soccer and education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially we focussed this review on studies that demonstrated positive cases of talent development in soccer (e.g., Gledhill & Harwood, 2014;Holt & Dunn, 2004) or factors considered important for talent development in soccer (e.g., Mills et al 2012;Morley et al 2014). This was followed by a broader consideration of wider literature associated with developmental considerations presented through the grounded theory, such as; learning (e.g., Eisenkopf, 2010), self-regulation (e.g., Toering et al 2009), role strain (e.g., Goldberg & Chandler, 1991), career transitions (e.g., Stambulova et al 2012) and dual career experiences (e.g., . In doing so, this allowed us to permeate into our analysis the second viewpoint of the cultural praxis of athletes' careers paradigm (Stambulova & Ryba, 2014).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Methodological Rigormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neidell and Waldfogel (2010) find that the unruly behavior of children with limited self-control or discipline has a bad influence 9 on their peers. Other studies investigate how educational outcomes are affected by peer groups defined by race (Link and Mulligan, 1991), parents' education level (McEwan, 2003), social proximity (Foster, 2006), and ability or achievement (Arnott and Rowse, 1987;Lefgren, 2004;Eisenkopf, 2010).…”
Section: B Explaining the Math Gender Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, -types may benefit from ℎ-types trough collaborations/study partnerships ( Carrell, Fullerton, and West 2009;Arcidiacono et al 2012;Jain and Kapoor 2015). Exposure to ℎ-types may also have a positive effect on -types' effort levels ( Eisenkopf 2010, Foster and Frijters 2010, and Bursztyn and Jensen 2015. Generally speaking, ℎ-types may serve as role models.…”
Section: Determinants Of Final Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%