“…Comparatively, children, who are insiders of the networks, may perceive their peer interactions beyond the observable cues (e.g., level of trust), which can make their perceptions qualitatively different from the other informants (Pearl et al, 2007;Neal et al, 2011). Another methodological explanation is that the child-report network contains information about the directionality of peer interactions (e.g., who likes to play with a child the most), whereas both the teacher-and the researcher-report networks represented peer interactions between pairs of children without specifying the directionality (i.e., who initiated the interactions) based on the assessment approaches applied in the field (e.g., Martin and Fabes, 2001;Schaefer et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2018;Lin et al, 2019). Unsurprisingly, the level of congruency among child-, teacher-, and researcher-report networks generally decreased as certain binary network transformation approach was applied.…”