2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01103.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer interventions to promote health: Conceptual considerations.

Abstract: Peers have intervened to promote health since ancient times, yet few attempts have been made to describe theoretically their role and their interventions. After a brief overview of the history and variety of peer-based health interventions, a 4-part definition of peer interveners is presented here with a consideration of the dimensions of their involvement in health promotion. Then, a 2-step process is proposed as a means of conceptualizing peer interventions to promote health. Step 1 involves establishing a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
202
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
202
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Peer support has long been described as 'a method in search of a theory' 4 and a recent revisiting of the theoretical basis notes that the research still remains largely theoretical. 148 Simoni et al 148 have mapped theoretical constructs to various types of peer-support interventions, for example education-based interventions; social support …”
Section: Identifying Candidate Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer support has long been described as 'a method in search of a theory' 4 and a recent revisiting of the theoretical basis notes that the research still remains largely theoretical. 148 Simoni et al 148 have mapped theoretical constructs to various types of peer-support interventions, for example education-based interventions; social support …”
Section: Identifying Candidate Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which different sources of information may influence viewer perceptions and physical activity and eating behaviors is unknown. Peers and experts are likely viewed differently in terms of credibility with experts having content knowledge, and peers having more social credibility and real-life understanding of the challenges faced in adopting new health behaviors (e.g., Simoni, Franks, Lehavot, & Yard, 2011). Both types of credibility seem to be important for health behavior change (e.g., Hopfer, 2012;Simoni et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While peer-based interventions have shown promise in public health [72][73][74][75], their efficacy for HIV prevention has been limited in vulnerable populations [22,23]. The use of digital technologies to compile social network data and the application of formal social network analysis to identify PCAs may improve the efficacy of interventions [23,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%