The Handbook of Language Socialization 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444342901.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Language Socialization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
71
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…(For examples of the different contexts, see collections such as Gardner & Wagner, 2004;Pallotti & Wagner, 2011;Wei, 2005). That which sets studies grounded in CA apart from psycholinguistic or sociolinguistic traditions in investigations of bilingualism is the focus on the action of language alternation as a product of the moment-to-moment practices achieved through interaction (Goodwin & Kyratzis, 2011). Such approaches view language alternation as situated action, but they also index participants' social identities and their interpersonal relationships with reference to the wider community in which these interactions take place (Sebba & Wootton, 1998).…”
Section: Bilingualismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For examples of the different contexts, see collections such as Gardner & Wagner, 2004;Pallotti & Wagner, 2011;Wei, 2005). That which sets studies grounded in CA apart from psycholinguistic or sociolinguistic traditions in investigations of bilingualism is the focus on the action of language alternation as a product of the moment-to-moment practices achieved through interaction (Goodwin & Kyratzis, 2011). Such approaches view language alternation as situated action, but they also index participants' social identities and their interpersonal relationships with reference to the wider community in which these interactions take place (Sebba & Wootton, 1998).…”
Section: Bilingualismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we examine the L1 socialization literature, learning ways to perform gender tends to be a central aspect of the process in various language contexts -and often in interactions between peers (Goodwin and Kyratzis 2012). This observation seems intuitive because LS research addresses how novices learn to communicate 'meaningfully, appropriately, and effectively' in and through social interaction (Ochs 1996: 408), and gender constitutes a crucial dimension of differences between peers (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet 2013).…”
Section: Socialization Into Gendered Linguistic Practices During Studmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodwin, , 1993Kidwell, 2005).What is actually being studied is the "interactional organization of social activities" (Hutchby & Wooffitt, 2008, p. 12). Seminal CA work on the importance of studying paralinguistic features of interaction (such as gaze, tone of voice and touch) with older children has been conducted by Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1990;Goodwin & Kyratzis, 2012). Her research has shed light on the complexities of children's interactions and has given an inside view of how interactive and fascinating the processes of creating and maintaining the peer culture is.…”
Section: Conversation Analysis In Toddler Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%