2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10804-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-leaders’ experiences and challenges in distributing HIV self-test kits in a rural fishing community, Rakai, Uganda

Abstract: Background Distribution of HIV self-test kits by trained lay people in the community has resulted in increased uptake of HIV testing services among the targeted populations. However, little data exists on the experiences and challenges faced by trained lay people while distributing the kits. Methods This qualitative study was conducted in Kasensero fishing community, Rakai, Uganda, in September 2019. We purposely selected 18 out of 34 peer-leaders … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since HIVST was a relatively new testing approach in Uganda [31], some men had reservations similar to those reported by Njau et al [27] such as how to use the kit, resolving of potential occurrences of self or social harm especially in unsupervised HIVST, and access to post-test support following HIVST. Although these concerns are reported to deter implementation of HIVST [30,63,[65][66][67], our study did not register any negative occurrences linked to HIVST. Regarding the need for support after HIVST, our research showed that VHT-delivered HIVST accompanied by information leaflets had a positive influence on the utilization of the surrounding facility-based HIV prevention and treatment services [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Since HIVST was a relatively new testing approach in Uganda [31], some men had reservations similar to those reported by Njau et al [27] such as how to use the kit, resolving of potential occurrences of self or social harm especially in unsupervised HIVST, and access to post-test support following HIVST. Although these concerns are reported to deter implementation of HIVST [30,63,[65][66][67], our study did not register any negative occurrences linked to HIVST. Regarding the need for support after HIVST, our research showed that VHT-delivered HIVST accompanied by information leaflets had a positive influence on the utilization of the surrounding facility-based HIV prevention and treatment services [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…How the strategies were combined and accessed differed for all 16 tested interventions. These included the following: facility counseling and testing ( 51 ); home-based counseling; and testing only ( 51 , 58 , 61 63 , 67 ), enhanced counseling ( 49 , 61 , 63 , 67 ), follow-up phone calls; and home visits enhanced counseling ( 44 , 50 , 54 , 59 ), referrals including the use of a referral logbook; and referrals made for re-linkage made for counseling; testing and care ( 49 , 50 , 55 , 56 , 59 , 63 ), mobile clinic ( 58 , 59 ), incentive reimbursement of transportation ( 45 , 52 , 53 ), escort ( 56 ), short message service (SMS) ( 53 ), community health campaigns ( 62 ), social network ( 62 ) and using HIVST ( 52 , 55 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It informs decisions to take towards future scale-up and dissemination of interventions. Some interventions that combined a mobile hybrid community-based testing strategy with a novel patient-centered, multicomponent linkage strategy resulted in high linkage rates, with half of all individuals in need of HIV care linked within one week of HIV testing and three-quarters linked within a year ( 45 , 58 , 61 , 67 ). This review method described participants’ characteristics, sample sizes, and representativeness in interventions to identify the target population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed that those who initiated the referral process by completing the web-based training had good connections with other community members. They were confident in and accepted the use of blood-based self-tests and could therefore serve as the point of reference when their peers encountered problems performing self-tests [ 28 ]. On the other hand, the positive feedback illustrated by their high system usability scores incited them to refer their peers [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%