1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022839208704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Relations and Chinese-Canadian Delinquency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the literature, we hypothesized significant gender differences on peer attachment, with females being more attached to their peers than their male counterparts (e.g., Gullone and Robinson 2005;Henrich et al 2001;Nada Raja et al 1992;Nelis and Rae 2009;Richards et al 2010;Ruijten et al 2011;Song et al 2009;Sund and WichstrØm 2002). Unlike for gender, we could not make any specific hypothesis regarding age differences, given the contradictory results reported in the literature (e.g., Elmore and Huebner 2010;Gallego et al 2011;Gullone and Robinson 2005;Paterson et al 1994;Wong 1998).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with the literature, we hypothesized significant gender differences on peer attachment, with females being more attached to their peers than their male counterparts (e.g., Gullone and Robinson 2005;Henrich et al 2001;Nada Raja et al 1992;Nelis and Rae 2009;Richards et al 2010;Ruijten et al 2011;Song et al 2009;Sund and WichstrØm 2002). Unlike for gender, we could not make any specific hypothesis regarding age differences, given the contradictory results reported in the literature (e.g., Elmore and Huebner 2010;Gallego et al 2011;Gullone and Robinson 2005;Paterson et al 1994;Wong 1998).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Furthermore, studies examining correlations between peer attachment and age as well as crosssectional comparisons of attachment levels reported by individuals of different ages have produced inconsistent findings, with some studies documenting a positive relationships between age and attachment (e.g., Gallego et al 2011;Gullone and Robinson 2005), some studies reporting a negative link (e.g., Elmore and Huebner 2010;Ma and Huebner 2008), and other studies reporting the lack of a significant association (e.g., Paterson et al 1994;Wong 1998). More specifically, inconsistent results were found in each age group examined in the various studies: age range 8-15 years (Elmore and Huebner 2010;Gullone and Robinson 2005;Nickerson and Nagle 2004); and age range 13-19 years (Gallego et al 2011;Paterson et al 1994;San Martini et al 2009;Wilkinson 2008, study 1;.…”
Section: Age Differences On Peer Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, the standard deviations of the social support measures were low, and this might help explain the lack of a significant relationship with the dependent variable. Other research has reported significant associations between delinquency and poor relationships between adolescents and parents and peers (Agnew, 2005;Barnes & Farrell, 1992;Cullen, 1994;Rutter, Giller, & Hagell, 1998;Wong, 1998;Wright & Cullen, 2001).…”
Section: A Hoskinmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Social support and attachment are crucial for mental health and acculturation ( 47 - 50 ). For example, it is reported that social support from peers has a positive relationship with health-related quality of life ( 51 ), mental health ( 47 ), self-esteem ( 52 ), less internalizing problems ( 53 ), and social anxiety ( 54 ) among immigrant adolescents.…”
Section: Peer Relationship: Attachment and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%