2017
DOI: 10.5414/cp202971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer review in Clinical Pharmacology using the 8-D Assessment

Abstract: The requirement for editors of clinical pharmacology journals to maintain an overview of the peer review process for manuscripts submitted can be facilitated by use of the 8-D Assessment. The 8-D Assessment comprises peer review criteria to determine if the:1. Design of the study, 2. Diagnoses employed, 3. Drug molecules involved, 4. Dosages applied, 5. Data collected, 6. Discussion of the findings, 7. Deductions made, and 8. Documentation are in accord with the objectives of the study and meet the requirement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) Guidelines for retraction should be developed. There are only few handbooks that guide how to cite retracted Fraudulent peer-review 2 Woodcock et al 2017 [28] articles. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) [39] has issued instructions using examples on how to cite retracted papers, but their use is not widely enforced by journals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Guidelines for retraction should be developed. There are only few handbooks that guide how to cite retracted Fraudulent peer-review 2 Woodcock et al 2017 [28] articles. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) [39] has issued instructions using examples on how to cite retracted papers, but their use is not widely enforced by journals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The herein described 10-D assessment tool for peer reviewers, authors, and publishers of clinical pharmacology manuscripts is a further development of the 7-D assessment [ 1 ] and 8-D assessment reported previously [ 2 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%