Peer Review of Impact: Could It Work?

Derrick, Gemma

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6_2

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Whereas differences in views between REC members are an expected part of group dynamics, and are a strength of academic groups assessing ambiguous or untested criteria (Derrick, 2018), for SM these views are further complicated by the differing understandings of whether virtual data are considered public or private. In this study, the level of REC member experience of reviewing and also conducting SM research shaped their perception of risk and the necessity of applying different levels of consent (traditional or negotiated).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research

Hibbin

Samuel

Derrick

2018

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social media (SM) research presents new challenges for research ethics committees (RECs) who must balance familiar ethical principles with new notions of public availability. This article qualitatively examines how U.K. REC members view this balance in terms of risk and consent. While it found significant variance overall, there were discernible experience-based trends. REC members with less experience of reviewing SM held inflexible notions of consent and risk that could be categorized as either relying on traditional notions of requiring direct consent, or viewing publicly available data as “fair game.” More experienced REC members took a more nuanced approach to data use and consent. We conclude that the more nuanced approach should be best practice during ethical review of SM research.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research

Hibbin

Samuel

Derrick

2018

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, Chubin et al . (1990) and Derrick (2018) assert that peer-reviewed journals do not always represent the novelty or final answer regarding research. Although there is no unique measure for quality research, we consider the number of publications issued by a country as quality R&D. In such cases, educational achievements at the tertiary education level would impact R&D and, subsequently, their number of publications.…”

Section: Results Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Educational achievements and export earnings: a comparison between leader and follower countries

Alam

Forhad

2023

IJCED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study examines whether education in developing countries directly impacts their foreign income from the top export sector.Design/methodology/approachAs most developing countries follow developed nations to shape their development, this study assumes developing countries as education-follower and developed countries as education-leader countries. Considering selected countries from the South Asian Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and African countries as follower countries and Group of Seven (G7) as leader countries, this study employs Dumitrescu-Hurlin Granger non-causality tests.FindingsThis study finds that education-follower countries' achievements do not directly impact foreign earnings from their leading export sectors. However, findings also confirm that leader countries have a bidirectional causal relationship between tertiary education and earnings from high technology exports.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study urging research-intensive education with comparative advantages in international trade. Using educational attainment on export earnings from the leading sector, findings support dependency theory in education is still existed.

show abstract

“…Pero conocer en detalle cómo negocian los investigadores la validación de sus propuestas por sus pares sigue siendo problemático. La financiación de proyectos de investigación tiende a centrarse en la producción y evaluación de conocimiento científico en tanto que instituciones (Bol et al, 2018; Bornmann, 2013; Derrick, 2018; Gläser & Laudel, 2016; Gläser & Serrano-Velarde, 2018; Mongeon et al, 2016; Van Arensbergen & Van der Besselaar, 2012). Y sin embargo, participar en el sistema de presentación de propuestas de financiación es narrativamente complejo (Mehlenbacher, 1994; Myers, 1990); la redacción de estas propuestas es específica para cada disciplina (Tardy, 2011) y los investigadores individuales desarrollan habilidades para la redacción de propuestas de diversas maneras (Casey & Fletcher, 2017; McAlpine, 2016).…”

Section: El Desarrollo Del Investigador Posdoctoral: Agencia Y Feedba...unclassified

“…But understanding how researchers negotiate peer acceptance of their proposals remains problematic. Funding research tends to focus on the production and valuation of scientific knowledge as institutions (Bol et al, 2018; Bornmann, 2013; Derrick, 2018; Gläser & Laudel, 2016; Gläser & Serrano-Velarde, 2018; Mongeon et al, 2016; Van Arensbergen & Van der Besselaar, 2012). Yet participating in the grant-funding system is rhetorically complex (Mehlenbacher, 1994; Myers, 1990), writing for funding is discipline-specific (Tardy, 2011), and individual researchers develop grantsmanship in differing ways (Casey & Fletcher, 2017; McAlpine, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing as a post-PhD researcher: agency and feedback in construction of grant funding success (El desarrollo del investigador posdoctoral: agencia y feedback en la preparación de propuestas de financiación exitosas)

Yousoubova

McAlpine

2022

Journal for the Study of Education and Development: Infancia y

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Grant funding is critical to building a sustained research career. Yet in this climate of academic performativity little is known about how individual academics make their contribution to knowledge fundable. This in-depth longitudinal case study explores an approach evolved by an experienced Canadian scientist whose work is recognized for both scholarly and societal impact. We demonstrate how, over ten years, his agentive participation in academic interactions has contributed to continual development of his research and its funding through: his seeking and engaging with feedback; network-wide view of feedback sources; and drawing on feedback to inform his writing and research thinking. The article suggests a developmental view of the process in which, over time, researchers conceive, expand and draw on their feedback networks. Locating funding success within the social dimensions of knowledge and researcher development, the study sheds light on the role of agency and experiential learning in enabling contributions to frontline knowledge. Results suggest a novel, encompassing way for post-PhD researchers to build towards sustained grant funding. RESUMENLa financiación procedente de subvenciones es clave para poder desarrollar una carrera investigadora. Sin embargo, en el clima actual de alta exigencia de resultados académicos, se conoce muy poco sobre cómo consiguen los académicos, a nivel individual, que se financie su contribución al conocimiento global. Mediante un detallado estudio de caso longitudinal se explora un enfoque desarrollado por un experto científico canadiense cuyo trabajo goza de reconocimiento tanto por su erudición como por su impacto social. En este estudio demostraremos cómo, durante un periodo de diez años, su participación activa ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Peer Review of Impact: Could It Work?

Cited by 4 publications

References 72 publications

From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research

From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research

Educational achievements and export earnings: a comparison between leader and follower countries

Developing as a post-PhD researcher: agency and feedback in construction of grant funding success (El desarrollo del investigador posdoctoral: agencia y feedback en la preparación de propuestas de financiación exitosas)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About