W as a crime committed, and if so, who committed it? What is the evidence that links the individual with the event? When and where did the crime take place? What happened, and how did it happen? What is the significance of the physical evidence? Forensic scientists must answer some, if not all, of these questions. Improvements in selectivity and detection limits of analytical methods have led to progress in the forensic analysis of a variety of evidence, including drugs and explosives, as well as material transferred from the criminal to the victim or the crime scene. In the context of terrorism, Analytical Chemistry has recently showcased forensic chemistry applications that can be used to prevent catastrophic events by detecting explosives and biohazards (1, 2).Several specific scientific developments in the mid-1980s and their application in widely publicized cases, combined with recent popular television shows, have focused a great deal of attention on forensic science. This exposure has increased undergraduate and graduate students' interest in forensic chemistry, and many colleges and universities in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia have developed new academic programs. A recent survey of academic institutions revealed that more than 90 U.S. colleges and universities claim to offer a program of study in forensic science (3). Much of this growth has occurred during the past 10-15 years.
A problem of numbersIn 1985, Sir Alec Jeffreys first introduced the now widely used technique of DNA fingerprinting, which can link DNA found at a crime scene with a suspect (4). Equally important were the advances in biochemistry and analytical chemistry, including Kary Mullis's development in that same year of